| 01:19 | Coburn | Where is dotarray these days? |
| 03:17 | _undo_ | good afternoon |
| 05:16 | _undo_ | where is it? |
| 05:18 | _undo_ | do they like scools in AU? |
| 05:18 | _undo_ | i don't |
| 05:19 | _undo_ | cause my english teacher didn't accept my 'th' |
| 05:22 | _undo_ | hehe |
| 05:26 | _undo_ | i don't like to speak the 'th' tho |
| 06:41 | _undo_ | hello kaspter, do you know casper!? |
| 06:42 | kaspter | sorry |
| 06:43 | _undo_ | casper's called the directory, where Debian´s-live boot files live |
| 06:44 | _undo_ | Debian Initrd magic looks like from casper ;) |
| 06:46 | _undo_ | sorry for missunderpreting your nick |
| 06:46 | kaspter | maybe, see here http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/lucid/man7/casper.7.html |
| 06:46 | _undo_ | who's who - who are you? |
| 06:47 | _undo_ | yess |
| 06:47 | _undo_ | it's in the manual |
| 06:48 | _undo_ | does this meen, that the 'loop' parameter is provided by casper? |
| 06:48 | _undo_ | or initramsfs-tools? |
| 06:48 | _undo_ | or both? |
| 06:52 | _undo_ | well.. seems to etc/initramfs |
| 06:53 | _undo_ | i have my own initramfs, so i do not probe other quite often |
| 06:53 | _undo_ | i tested shortly, from debian, and initramfs |
| 06:54 | _undo_ | i don't know if the 'scripts' (directory) is from initramfs-tools´s default /etc, or etc |
| 07:22 | _undo_ | we don't care, cause of the CuBox Installer, and it´s potential |
| 07:23 | _undo_ | we don't get wiser through the 'casper' directory |
| 07:24 | _undo_ | router´s os can be our ideal ;) |
| 07:25 | _undo | 07:25 * _undo_ is going idle |
| 07:25 | _undo_ | sorry again, for my pedantic minor edits on the wiki :) |
| 07:26 | _undo_ | i see, that's all just temporary - and growing |
| 07:30 | _undo_ | or the end at all, cause nobody asks a single question :-) |
| 08:40 | _undo_ | is it hot ;) |
| 09:41 | dv_ | what are the main differences between the contents of cubox-packages.tar.gz and the contents of http://download.solid-run.com/pub/solidrun/cubox/packages/ , aside from the .deb files? are there functional differences? like, are the binaries in the tarball softfp? |
| 09:42 | dv_ | I am confused as to what i should use, the contents of the big tarball, or the individual stuff. especially because some parts like the vmeta C headers are missing from the individual packages |
| 11:22 | rabeeh | dv_: check this too - http://download.solid-run.com/pub/solidrun/cubox/repo/ |
| 12:29 | dv_ | rabeeh: well, I am assembling scripts for building a rootfs using yocto, and have one working version already, but redoing it since it has lots of hacks |
| 12:31 | dv_ | rabeeh: so I wonder what to choose as source. the big unified package, the individual ones, or your repo? I'd guess the unified one, since it seems to have all headers, libraries etc. in one archive |
| 12:32 | dv_ | also, IIRC, it is not recommended to use the stuff from the marvell-ipp directory, since its softfp |