| 01:00 | cbxbiker61 | http://www.jupiterbroadcasting.com/50842/cubox-linux-review-las-s30e08/ |
| 01:00 | cbxbiker61 | it'll be interesting to see what they say about the cubox-i, first i have to watch the super bowl |
| 01:49 | CodeAddict | Hi. |
| 01:49 | CodeAddict | Anyone active here? |
| 06:27 | cbxbiker61 | Chris at the Linux Action Show did a good/fair review of the i4-pro, that's awesome! |
| 07:37 | _dab_ | does anyone know what the load address and entry point should be for mkimage on an i4pro |
| 07:37 | _dab_ | 3.13 kernel? |
| 08:22 | rabeeh | cbxbiker61: thanks for the link; a very good coverage. |
| 09:13 | MikeSeth | morning! |
| 09:13 | MikeSet | 09:13 * MikeSeth pokes rabeeh |
| 09:13 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: morning |
| 09:14 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: when you introduced Cubox SPL into your uboot tree it somehow broke MMC, there are some cards for which the partition table isn't readable by uboot |
| 09:15 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: this began happening since commit a577b7980a |
| 09:15 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: there is a mysterious bug in SPL support that is still not found |
| 09:15 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: oooh, tell me tell me tell me |
| 09:17 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: also, would it help you if I gave you the card that has the problem? |
| 10:21 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: my previous message - i can't reproduce any of the issues that are mentioned to me (for instance sraue told me few times that his SPL can't boot uImage) |
| 10:21 | rabeeh | not another net split |
| 10:22 | MikeSeth | freenode is being ddosed |
| 10:22 | gori | [We're currently experiencing what appears to be a DOS attack against our servers. Some servers are offline, and local IPs appear in the rotation, meaning that some connections will fail. | 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2 addresses in DNS are for mitigation and will be removed when this passes] |
| 10:22 | gori | heh |
| 10:22 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: I can give you the card on which the partition table is unreadable |
| 10:22 | rabeeh | so it's happening on your CuBox? |
| 10:22 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: yes |
| 10:23 | rabeeh | which brand is it? |
| 10:23 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: only for a specific type of card |
| 10:23 | MikeSeth | -i1 |
| 10:23 | MikeSeth | C4 Transcend Micro 4Gb |
| 10:23 | MikeSeth | C4 Sandisk 4Gb has no problem |
| 10:23 | rabeeh | i might have an exact model |
| 10:24 | MikeSeth | basically the uboot code either mangles the partition table or reads mangled values from MMC |
| 10:24 | rabeeh | i have one that says - 'Transcend 4GB (4) MicroSD HC' |
| 10:24 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: the card isn't on me, I can't confirm, but it is one of those 30 shekel cards sold w/o adapters |
| 10:24 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: there was a suggested patch from jnettlet that fixes the bss sections |
| 10:24 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: for build breakage/ |
| 10:25 | MikeSeth | ? |
| 10:25 | MikeSeth | I applied it on top of a577b7 to make it build; doesn't help |
| 10:25 | MikeSeth | I mean it does help in that it makes that commit build |
| 10:25 | rabeeh | http://pastebin.com/084Bmt1w |
| 10:26 | rabeeh | that one? |
| 10:26 | MikeSeth | no, I don't know anything about BSS mapping issues |
| 10:27 | MikeSeth | btw thew new SPL code does |
| 10:28 | MikeSeth | MX6QDL_SET_PAD(PAD_SD2_CLK__USDHC2_CLK , MUX_PAD_CTRL(USDHC_PAD_CTRL)); |
| 10:28 | MikeSeth | but the pre-SPL one does MUX_PAD_CTRL(USDHC_PAD_CLK_CTRL) |
| 10:28 | MikeSeth | is that by design? |
| 10:32 | rabeeh | i don't thin it's relevant |
| 10:32 | rabeeh | in that micro SD 50MHz clock will be used (class 4) |
| 10:32 | rabeeh | i doubt this is the issue; but worth fixing in any case |
| 10:33 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: can you build u-boot? |
| 10:33 | rabeeh | i can send you u-boot images with that bss fix to try out on that micro sd |
| 10:34 | rabeeh | the symptoms were 3 for now; SPL can't boot uImage, SPL can't detect micro SD partitions and there is an internal flag to decide if this is HB and CBi and in some point it got corrupted too |
| 10:35 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: I can build uboot |
| 10:35 | MikeSeth | I'll try this at lunch |
| 10:35 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: it would be great; i have lots of reports about failures but i'm unable to reproduce any |
| 10:36 | rabeeh | i think the main issue would be around memory trashing due to stack or bss allocations; which leads me to the thought that it is toolchain dependent |
| 10:36 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: hm |
| 10:36 | rabeeh | (i.e. every toolchain provides different layout of the memory) |
| 10:36 | rabeeh | s/memory/binary |
| 10:36 | MikeSeth | I use gcc 4.7 in Debian in x86 vagrant |
| 10:37 | MikeSeth | it is indeed possible, and in fact not unlikely because the partition analysis code that breaks branches when the value it reads from the device structure is -1 |
| 10:39 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: I'll get back to you in a couple of hours with a patch test result and the description of my environment |
| 10:39 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: oh yes, most important |
| 10:40 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: the partition table problem is card specific |
| 10:40 | MikeSeth | another card with same uboot images would NOT have this problem |
| 10:40 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: you are talking about u-boot runtime; not the SPL code - right? |
| 10:40 | rabeeh | i mean SPL is able to load u-boot.img; but afterward it breaks |
| 10:40 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: yeah |
| 10:40 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: mmc part shows "Unknown partition table' |
| 10:53 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: I've just realized that the card that has the problem might be the card I got from you, on which the adroid was installed |
| 11:05 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: great - then i will be able to reproduce it really fast |
| 11:05 | rabeeh | well.. i take it back; because i use those micro SD daily :) |
| 11:12 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: it also might have something to do with the device used to write the card, it behaves kind of weird |
| 11:34 | jnettlet | few that is better. freenode dns was only returning ipv6 addresses all of a sudden |
| 11:37 | Coolgeek | jnettlet: there was a DDoS running |
| 11:37 | jnettlet | wonderful |
| 11:55 | _rmk_ | and looks like it still is... |
| 11:56 | davorin | is there somewhere documented what screen resolutions i can throw off at ubbot in uenv.txt? |
| 12:00 | rabeeh | davorin: i haven't seen a document about this |
| 12:00 | davorin | does uboot adjust according to uenv.txt or just passes it to the kernel? |
| 12:00 | rabeeh | the only thing i'v seen that it's internal fractional pll can go into 1hz deviation with any resolution |
| 12:01 | rabeeh | u-boot screen resolution is fixed |
| 12:01 | davorin | hmm.... |
| 12:09 | _dab_ | _rmk_: need help with mkimage for 3.13.1 uImage. entry point address? |
| 12:13 | _rmk_ | hmm. I stopped using uImage here... 0x10008000 |
| 12:13 | _rmk_ | I think... |
| 12:14 | _rmk_ | yea. |
| 12:15 | _rmk_ | you do know uboot can boot the plain zImage on cubox-i ? |
| 12:16 | _rmk_ | I do this: |
| 12:16 | _rmk_ | tftp ${loadaddr} imx6.zImage |
| 12:16 | _rmk_ | tftp ${fdt_addr} ${fdtfile} |
| 12:16 | _rmk_ | fdt addr ${fdt_addr} |
| 12:16 | _rmk_ | bootz ${loadaddr} ${uinitrd_addr} ${fdt_addr} |
| 12:17 | _rmk_ | replace the tftp lines as appropriate for where you want to obtain the zImage / fdt files from |
| 12:25 | _dab_ | I guessed that. Starting kernel ... (and thats it). linaro gcc 4.8. Debugging suggestions |
| 12:27 | _rmk_ | CONFIG_DEBUG_LL=y |
| 12:27 | _rmk_ | CONFIG_DEBUG_IMX6Q_UART=y |
| 12:27 | _rmk_ | CONFIG_DEBUG_IMX_UART_PORT=1 |
| 12:27 | _rmk_ | for a start, and then... |
| 12:28 | _rmk_ | what I tend to do is not bother with stuff like early console, I just edit kernel/printk/printk.c and add: |
| 12:28 | _rmk_ | { extern void printascii(const char *); printascii(text); } |
| 12:28 | _rmk_ | immediately after the vscnprintf() in there |
| 12:32 | _rmk_ | hmm, does that mean _dab_ didn't see my reply... |
| 12:39 | _rmk_ | _dab_: did you see my reply? |
| 13:06 | _rmk_ | Broken pipes cause excessive flooding in freenode, expect much disruption. :p |
| 13:26 | jnettlet | time for a new IRC server? |
| 13:29 | _rmk_ | jnettlet: new IRC server, or new IRC network with "DDoS" attacks investigated and prevention put in place? |
| 13:30 | jnettlet | _rmk_, yes please. |
| 13:30 | jnettlet | Wow, look familiar? http://news.softpedia.com/news/Nitrux-Develops-an-ARM-Mini-Computer-Called-QtBox-Powered-by-KDE-423016.shtml |
| 13:31 | jnettlet | Cubox QtBox? |
| 13:31 | jnettlet | http://store.nitrux.in/ direct link |
| 13:38 | davorin | "affordable price-tag" ??? |
| 13:39 | xraxor__ | new XBMC distro for cubox-i dual and quad http://imx.solid-run.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=528&p=3246#p3246 |
| 14:05 | sickness | I'm back |
| 14:16 | rabeeh | xraxor__: great !!! |
| 14:18 | xraxor__ | :) |
| 14:26 | rabeeh | xraxor__: he mentions in his forum post that he seems to have debianizes the gl/vpu packages |
| 14:26 | rabeeh | hste__ and jas-hacks - maybe you can look into this? you might be able to use as-is |
| 14:28 | rabeeh | one of the issue mk01 has mentioned is a newer kernel (obvious request) mainly for btrfs support |
| 15:09 | mk01 | guten morgen |
| 15:57 | rabeeh | mk01: great work... it was soo fast :) |
| 15:57 | rabeeh | freenode has been under attack for few hours; so irc is a bit unstable |
| 16:02 | xraxor__ | nothing is safe nowadays :/ |
| 16:02 | xraxor__ | people with too much free time?! |
| 16:05 | rabeeh | xraxor__: i think commitment for goals is timeless |
| 16:06 | rabee | 16:06 * rabeeh hopes that the previous sentence is even correct English wise :) |
| 16:09 | xraxor__ | :) |
| 18:19 | MikeSeth | well damn |
| 18:26 | _Rarity | Hello, I have just received my Cubox-I pro and I have successfully installed the premade Debian OS on it. However, the internet doesn't work on it, how do I enable it? |
| 18:26 | MarcusVinter | Are you trying to use wifi or ethernet? |
| 18:27 | _Rarity | Well, Wifi would be best, but I have an ethernet cable available too |
| 18:28 | MarcusVinter | Have you tried ethernet first? |
| 18:31 | _Rarity | Yes, the cable I put in it worked fine on other computers |
| 18:32 | _Rarity | when I run ifconfig, the terminal tells me that eth0 and wlan0 are disabled. I have tried to add these lines to /etc/network/interface: |
| 18:33 | _Rarity | "auto eth0, iface eht0 inet static" |
| 18:34 | MarcusVinter | "ifconfig eth0 up"? |
| 18:35 | _rmk_ | https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration#Configuring_the_interface_manually |
| 18:35 | _rmk_ | you need a little more for static ip configuration than what you've quoted |
| 18:35 | MarcusVinter | Yeah |
| 18:35 | MarcusVinter | I use DHCP and that works fine for me |
| 18:35 | _rmk_ | or use dhcp: https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration#Using_DHCP_to_automatically_configure_the_interface |
| 18:36 | _Rarity | Please hold on, I'll turn on my Cubox and report what I see :) |
| 18:42 | MikeSeth | iface eth0 inet dhcp allow-hotplug |
| 18:42 | MikeSeth | auto eth0 |
| 18:43 | MikeSeth | ^^ contents of /etc/network/interfaces |
| 18:43 | MikeSeth | then in command line: |
| 18:43 | MikeSeth | ifup eth0 |
| 18:44 | MikeSeth | if you dont have/want dhcp, the syntax is indeed in the debian wiki |
| 18:44 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: seen my mail? |
| 18:45 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: yes. |
| 18:45 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: want the card? |
| 18:45 | rabeeh | yes. |
| 18:47 | __Rarity | Yes, that is the content of my /etc/network/interface |
| 18:48 | __Rarity | But when I try to "sudo ifup eth0", it writes a longer message ending with these two lines: "unable to set up timer: unexpected error" and "Failed to bring up eth0" |
| 18:52 | MarcusVinter | you tried eth1 just in casE? |
| 18:52 | MarcusVinter | case* |
| 18:53 | __Rarity | No, but ifconfig says eth0 |
| 18:55 | __Rarity | Hold on, maybe the addresses in my static configuration might be wrong |
| 18:57 | MikeSeth | __Rarity: no, this seems to be a driver/hardware problem, what kernel do you use? uname -a |
| 18:57 | MikeSeth | I've seen it reported before |
| 18:58 | MikeSeth | http://imx.solid-run.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=525 <- this guy has the same problem |
| 18:59 | MarcusVinter | I'm using jas-hacks build. its perfect. |
| 19:00 | MikeSeth | same here, though I am building my own rootfs |
| 19:01 | MarcusVinter | Can I have it when you're done? |
| 19:02 | MikeSeth | sure, it'll take a couple of days though |
| 19:03 | MarcusVinter | Sure, Ill remind you next week or something :P |
| 19:03 | MarcusVinter | Thanks man. |
| 19:03 | MikeSeth | welcome |
| 19:04 | MikeSeth | I actually have the whole build process working, now I just need to do cubox specific configuration and write scripts to build images for different card sizes |
| 19:06 | MarcusVinter | :O |
| 19:07 | MarcusVinter | mines 16 GB lol |
| 19:08 | MikeSeth | yeah the problem with the images we have is they're small |
| 19:36 | __Rarity | MikeSeth: when I run "uname -r", i get "3.0.35-g0f2006c-dirty" |
| 19:38 | MikeSeth | __Rarity: yeah, that's the current kernel |
| 19:39 | MikeSeth | if you just do ifconfig eth0 up what happens? |
| 19:42 | __Rarity | Then it writes: "eth0: Freescale FEC PHY driver .... (skipped) ... PHY: 1:00 - Link is up - 100/Full" |
| 19:43 | __Rarity | But "ping -c3 www.google.com" writes: "unknown host www.google.com" |
| 19:43 | MikeSeth | that's normal |
| 19:44 | rabeeh | __Rarity: you would need to tell it to dhcp |
| 19:44 | rabeeh | for instance 'sudo dhclient eth0' |
| 19:46 | prae5 | Hi, can anyone point me to documentation for creating bootable img files for redistribuitng os images? I normally use dd to create an empty image, then use losetup and parted to partition them before copying data to them |
| 19:46 | prae5 | I've tried this and it doesn't quite seem to work |
| 19:47 | prae5 | are there any docs on this / details on how the official images are created? |
| 19:49 | __Rarity | rabeeh: the command runs without any messages |
| 19:50 | heap | Hello, may i have a question about CuBox Pro the old model. does it have SATA multiplier? |
| 19:50 | hste | __Rarity: what does ifconfig tell u after you ran dhclient? |
| 19:55 | __Rarity | hste: written by hand, this is the output of "sudo ifconfig -a" http://pastebin.com/Nj5e83aw |
| 19:55 | MikeSeth | __Rarity: run dhclient eth0 manually, see what happens |
| 19:55 | hste | __Rarity: do u have dhcp on your cabled net? |
| 19:56 | MikeSeth | prae5: create a filesystem normally, follow the steps in http://imx.solid-run.com/wiki/index.php?title=Building_the_kernel_and_u-boot_for_the_CuBox-i_and_the_HummingBoard |
| 19:56 | MikeSeth | then dump the image of the card |
| 19:56 | MikeSeth | that'll give you a bootable image |
| 19:56 | prae5 | MikeSeth: thanks, I'll take a look |
| 19:56 | rabeeh | heap: yes. it support sata port multiplier |
| 19:57 | prae5 | however if that relies on their being a sd thats not what I'm looking for |
| 19:57 | prae5 | I'm looking to create a .img without having a image on a sd card |
| 19:58 | MikeSeth | prae5: nothing prevents you from dd'ing to a file instead of a card device |
| 19:58 | __Rarity | hste: I actually don't know, as I have to use my laptop for sharing the network via ethernet cable. (I can either connect my HDMI display OR the ethernet cable from the router to the cubox) |
| 19:58 | __Rarity | (its an Ubuntu laptop) |
| 19:59 | prae5 | MikeSeth: I'll re-read that wiki entry, it looks similar to what I've done already and it isn't producing bootable images - hopefully I've missed something obvious :) |
| 20:00 | MikeSeth | prae5: the recipe in the wiki was majorly updated yesterday from an older version |
| 20:00 | MikeSeth | also, what do you mean non-bootable? |
| 20:01 | prae5 | ahh thats hopeful :) and i'm not sure exactly what the issue is - I don't have my devices yet so am doing this blind and relying on feedback from users |
| 20:01 | prae5 | for reference, I'm producing nightly dev releases of OpenELEC which are distributed from http://xbmcnightlybuilds.com |
| 20:02 | prae5 | I'll put together a new image based on the updated wiki and get someone to do some testing and see where we are |
| 20:03 | MikeSeth | prae5: there are several bugs in the bootloader that might affect certain cards and monitors |
| 20:03 | MikeSeth | doing this blind and remotely would be risky |
| 20:04 | prae5 | yup, is less that ideal at the moment - I had been holding of adding cubox images until i got my devices |
| 20:04 | prae5 | but keep getting bugged several times a day, so have caved to user pressure |
| 20:04 | MikeSeth | cheat ;) |
| 20:05 | prae5 | at the moment, i'm not putting up full img file - but thats what is being asked for the most |
| 20:05 | MikeSeth | get a working OS image from the wiki |
| 20:05 | MikeSeth | copy first megabyte into your blank file |
| 20:05 | MikeSeth | copy your filesystem into the partition |
| 20:05 | MikeSeth | add uEnv.txt, kernel and modules |
| 20:06 | prae5 | hmmm that might be workable, not ideal but should be able to sort something for the short term at least |
| 20:07 | MikeSeth | also I think there was another guy around here who did something around openelec |
| 20:08 | MikeSeth | but I won't recall who that is |
| 20:08 | __Rarity | hste: My router has DHCP enabled though, so I guess the dhcp configuration in /etc/network/interface should work |
| 20:09 | prae5 | Is probably Stephen, he is the OE project lead/founder |
| 20:09 | MikeSeth | __Rarity: configure the interface manually if dhcp doesn't work |
| 20:10 | MikeSeth | ip a a dev eth0 |
| 20:10 | MikeSeth | ip r a default via |
| 20:10 | MikeSeth | then ping 8.8.8.8 |
| 20:12 | __Rarity | MikeSeth: Will do. Unfortunatelly, I have to go now, but thanks for all the help :) |
| 20:12 | __Rarity | (And thanks to everyone else here!) |
| 20:13 | MikeSeth | welcome |
| 20:13 | MikeSeth | please do report results, as this seems to happen to other people |
| 20:15 | __Rarity | MikeSeth: Will do. I will try to answer the question to the previous post someone mentioned earlier in the forums |
| 20:19 | _rmk_ | I guess the better answer would be to ensure that network manager is installed... the default should be to dhcp whenever the link becomes available (something dhcp started via ifup won't do) |
| 20:20 | MikeSeth | _rmk_: might very well be misconfigured router or some stupid link-level magic |
| 20:20 | _rmk_ | and the comment about being able to connect either HDMI or ethernet at the same time was rather interesting |
| 20:21 | MikeSeth | you wouldn't believe the kind of adventures I had with realtek chips |
| 20:21 | MikeSeth | well, *you* probably would |
| 20:21 | MikeSeth | but still ;) |
| 20:21 | _rmk_ | I have a draytek router... nothing gets as bad as they do :) |
| 20:22 | MikeSeth | well, I had a guy once flash the wrong firmware on the lvds controller after replacing a screen on the laptop... |
| 20:22 | MikeSeth | though this is not a competition |
| 20:23 | MikeSeth | not to mention Fuji DSL DMT chips, oh god |
| 20:23 | _rmk_ | said draytek operated its ethernet in promiscuous mode, and IP routed every packet it saw on the LAN. |
| 20:24 | MikeSeth | that's nice |
| 20:24 | MikeSeth | literally a router |
| 20:24 | MikeSeth | what happens if you put two of those in the same lan? |
| 20:24 | _rmk_ | it'll bounce packets between both :) |
| 20:24 | _rmk_ | but that's not the worst of it... |
| 20:26 | _rmk_ | I have two lines between here and I had the situation where a packet went up line 1, got duplicated and sent up line 2. remote host replies to the first packet from line 1 which was returned down line 1. router sees it on the local network, and ended up routing that packet back out up line 2... which then forwarded it back down line 1. |
| 20:26 | _rmk_ | you can guess the result from that. |
| 20:27 | _rmk_ | meanwhile the packet that went up line 2 got its source address NAT'd differently, hit the remote host, which said "I don't know this connection, here, have a TCP reset"... returned down line 2, de-NAT'd and returned to the original host... which then killed the TCP connection. |
| 20:28 | _rmk_ | also... whenever I ping'd the router on line 1... I got three responses per sent ping. |
| 20:28 | _rmk_ | three? no, four. |
| 20:29 | _rmk_ | one from the router on line 1. one from router 2 seeing the response and duplicating the packet. then think about it duplicating the ping request too. |
| 20:31 | MikeSeth | that is FNU |
| 20:32 | MikeSeth | fun* |
| 20:32 | MikeSeth | in the dwarf fortress definition of fun |
| 20:39 | heap | rabeeh: and it works fine with kernel drivers etc? |
| 22:53 | mk01 | is it possible to specify ramdisk in uEnv.txt loaded as bootenv from mmc ? |
| 23:00 | mikehamer____ | hi |
| 23:00 | mikehamer____ | anyone are interested in tax free cigarettes?? |
| 23:02 | MikeSeth | mk01: you can specify any parameters to the kernel |
| 23:02 | mikehamer____ | anyone are interested in tax free cigarettes?? |
| 23:03 | MikeSeth | /ignore mikehamer____ ALL |
| 23:03 | mikehamer____ | wai poola |
| 23:06 | mk01 | mikeseth: you mean load initramfs and provide this address as argument in bootargs= ? |
| 23:06 | mk01 | re "load ramdisk to a memory address and pass this info trough kernel command line " |
| 23:06 | mk01 | ? |
| 23:07 | MikeSeth | yes, uboot should support that |
| 23:08 | MikeSeth | I wouldn't know how to configure uboot for it but some folks here or in #imx6-dev might |
| 23:09 | mk01 | yes, bootm can have 3 arguments (kernel,ramdisk,devt) |
| 23:10 | mk01 | ok fair enough |
| 23:10 | MikeSeth | this is how it was done for the _old_ cubox: http://www.solid-run.com/mw/index.php/Initial_RAM_Disk |
| 23:11 | mk01 | ramdisk should be also mkimage as none compression - if kernel normally decompress gzip ? |
| 23:12 | mk01 | ok, so I don't have to specify special command line parameters. just load kernel and initramfs |
| 23:12 | MikeSeth | I really don't know, sorry |
| 23:14 | mk01 | you helped a lot |
| 23:14 | MikeSeth | also I am not certain if in stock kernel ramdisk support is enabled at all |
| 23:14 | mk01 | no it is not |
| 23:16 | mk01 | I was trying this way manually but console is scrolling too fast and broke the serial connector (microusb). I have to try again as soon as new device comes and I will see the actual error. |
| 23:17 | MikeSeth | you might be able to get the screen to higher resolutio |
| 23:17 | MikeSeth | resolution* |
| 23:18 | mk01 | I'm currently at 217x46 |
| 23:18 | mk01 | 8x14 font |
| 23:20 | mk01 | or maybe it is possible to set larger backbuffer on screen ? |
| 23:21 | mk01 | or I can simply finish booting and check with dmesg, no ? if not large enough I will make it larger. |
| 23:21 | mk01 | and resolution is 1920x1080 |
| 23:22 | mk01 | the problem is that on compression algorithm wrong or wrong cpio error is shown but booting continues normally (if root is available and mountable). so it scrolls all up |
| 23:31 | MikeSeth | perform the boot manually step by step |
| 23:38 | MikeSeth | ok, card corruption by the host is ruled out, same card on a different os, machine and reader, still no partition table |
| 23:38 | MikeSet | 23:38 * MikeSeth ponders card interrogation |