| 02:25 | Coburn | _rmk_, are you there? |
| 02:27 | firemanxbr | kalasmannen, what's command you use in this case ? |
| 02:27 | firemanxbr | kalasmannen, I have some experience in ffmpeg, I can help you. |
| 02:32 | Dacto | Has anyone setup a cross-compiling toolchain for arm? |
| 02:32 | Dacto | I'm trying to use crosstool-ng to set one up but I keep running into problems |
| 02:33 | Coburn | Dacto: most distros have one |
| 02:33 | Coburn | what distro? |
| 02:33 | Dacto | arch |
| 02:33 | Coburn | look in the repos to see if you have a ARM chain. |
| 02:33 | Coburn | Use your distro's one, it is less hassle. |
| 02:35 | Dacto | distcc style? |
| 02:53 | Dacto | Coburn: what distro do you use for cross compiling? |
| 02:53 | Coburn | Debian |
| 02:53 | Coburn | On a ODROID-XU ARMHF |
| 02:53 | Coburn | which uses like GCC 4.7.x |
| 02:54 | Coburn | it was like gcc-armhf-linux-gnueabi or something |
| 02:54 | Dacto | are you cross compiling on the ODROID or just compiling? |
| 02:54 | Coburn | using the ODROID compiling kernels for CuBox |
| 02:54 | Coburn | I just set the kernel to target CuBox and let it rip |
| 08:51 | Herb__ | TV optimizing? any plan |
| 10:59 | kalasmannen | bummer that i already had gone to bed... :/ |
| 11:11 | MikeSeth | holy god this channel tripled in size |
| 11:12 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: \o/ |
| 11:13 | rabeeh | more and more people are joining :) |
| 11:13 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: did you go on a PR binge or something? |
| 11:13 | MikeSeth | I leave for a week and there's suddenly people! |
| 11:13 | MikeSeth | I've scooped up a bunch of books on electronics, a breadboard and a bunch of components |
| 11:14 | MikeSeth | figured out the math for voltage dividers and the physical properties of semiconductors yesterday :P |
| 11:16 | zaher | mostly stalkers such as myself :) |
| 11:20 | rabeeh | physical properties of semiconductors ? |
| 11:20 | rabeeh | hi zaher |
| 11:20 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: yeah, as in why n-p junctions work, electron energy levels, forbidden zones etc |
| 11:21 | zaher | hey rabeeh. I saw the distribution discussion yesterday. Interesting :) |
| 11:23 | rabeeh | zaher: yeah; i quoted you on the "anything but Ubuntu" :) |
| 11:23 | zaher | rabeeh: now I am going to get hate mail.. |
| 11:24 | zaher | rabeeh: do you know if anyone had success getting etnaviv running on CBi? |
| 11:25 | rabeeh | etnaviv worked on gc2k last week... i wonder on which platform |
| 11:25 | rabeeh | wumpus should have his CBi4pro in hand |
| 11:25 | rabeeh | zaher: wumpus is the magician behind etnaviv |
| 11:26 | zaher | rabeeh: cannot wait to move away from 3.0.35 kernel. |
| 11:26 | rabeeh | soon my friend; soon |
| 11:26 | rabeeh | rmk, jnettlet and others has put lots of effort on upstream and LK 3.10.7 |
| 11:27 | zaher | that's why I am here.. waiting silently :) |
| 11:27 | rabeeh | jnettlet yesterday got last batch of patches from rmk; mainly focusing on sdio issues and jnettlet should have something to show in the next few days (jnettlet - is this accurate?) |
| 11:31 | rabeeh | zaher: kossay says hi |
| 11:31 | rabeeh | which platform do you have now? only hb? |
| 11:32 | zaher | rabeeh say hi back. I am really happy to see the fruit of your work guys.. very proud :) |
| 11:33 | zaher | I have hb and loving it, such a mean little machine. |
| 11:33 | rabeeh | the newer version (production one) is leaner and meaner |
| 11:34 | zaher | I'll come to visit you guys next time I am home |
| 11:39 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: if you want to discuss electrons, spins and stuff; Zaher has PHd in phyiscs from the Technion |
| 11:40 | MikeSeth | rabeeh: I don't think I am at the point where I can bug people with PhDs with silly questions ;) |
| 11:41 | MikeSeth | but by the way it looks I'll need an oscilloscope and a logic analyzer soon |
| 11:41 | rabeeh | ok; looks we are in the same level then; you can bug me if you want |
| 11:41 | rabeeh | if you want up to 50MHz logic analyzer; i'v previously used the USB based dongles and works pretty good |
| 11:41 | rabeeh | i forgot the brand though |
| 11:42 | rabeeh | for scope, if you want up to 100mhz Rigol is a good candidate |
| 11:42 | MikeSeth | oh, not just yet, first I'm going to put together a stabilized bench supply |
| 11:42 | MikeSeth | I've been eyeing second hand tektronics on yad2 |
| 11:43 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: the i.MX6 reference manual mentions that the SATA phys can be used as scope :) |
| 11:44 | MikeSeth | and a bunch of resistors hooked up to an LPT port can be used as a soundcard, doesn't mean you SHOULD do that ;) |
| 11:44 | rabeeh | it doesn't say how though... |
| 11:44 | rabeeh | MikeSeth: come on, use your imagination :) |
| 11:44 | rabeeh | dirt chip scope for schools :) |
| 11:44 | rabeeh | s/chip/cheap |
| 11:45 | MikeSeth | you really should put a docking/gpio port on the next gen cubox, then we could actually DO things like this |
| 11:46 | MikeSeth | btw those tektronix scopes I saw are ~700 shekel |
| 11:46 | MikeSeth | that's quite affordable considering that this is a principal instrument |
| 11:48 | rabeeh | 700 NIS only? |
| 11:48 | MikeSeth | yeah |
| 11:56 | jnettlet | rabeeh, yes. with the latest rebase there is a bit more work to do merging the freescale patchset in but I am making progress. |
| 11:56 | MikeSeth | uhh, rebase merges are hell |
| 11:56 | MikeSeth | that's the one thing I liked about darcs |
| 11:56 | MikeSeth | branch don't merge? moar fuzz factor |
| 11:56 | jnettlet | unfortunately freescale has made the horrific mistake of doing an enormous cosmetic change in the device-tree in the middle of their patchset. Basically making any chance of upstreaming this stuff a complete nightmare |
| 11:57 | MikeSeth | jnettlet: no way to pre-rebase and split the commits then mask out the cosmetic ones? |
| 12:00 | jnettlet | not really no. |
| 12:01 | MikeSeth | well, common sense 0, freescale 1 |
| 12:03 | _rmk_ | looks like gregkh threw three more of my imx-drm patches into mainline recently |
| 12:03 | jnettlet | well just no forethought of what their actions meant. They are treating their kernel branch like it is the endgame, not that it should be upstreamed and doing a stupid change like this makes that impossible |
| 12:04 | jnettlet | well not impossible just time consuming and annoying |
| 12:04 | jnettlet | _rmk_, great! |
| 12:04 | rabeeh | _rmk_ great !!! |
| 12:23 | wumpus | rabeeh: yes I have it :) |
| 12:52 | rabeeh | wumpus: the message from last week on etnaviv on gc2k; was it on CBi? |
| 12:53 | rabeeh | i recall you had gk802 too? |
| 13:02 | wumpus | rabeeh: yes I have a gk802 too; but the message about gc2k was from austriancoder, he uses some other imx6 dev board but I'm not sure which one |
| 13:02 | wumpus | haven't tested etnaviv on the new cubox yet, but will get around to it soon hopefully |
| 13:51 | rjc | from the description on http://www.solid-run.com/mw/index.php/IRC_channel I understand that this is a dev channel |
| 13:52 | rjc | so forgive me for intrusion if that is indeed the case, but I ran out of ideas |
| 13:52 | rjc | is there anyone form Solid Run on this channel by any chance? |
| 13:54 | rjc | I've been trying to contact someone regarding my order (again, sorry if not the right place) |
| 13:54 | rjc | but my emails remain without any reply |
| 13:57 | rjc | I left a comment (very unfavorable BTW) on the cubox-i's website and it has been in "awaiting moderation" state for the past two days! |
| 13:58 | rjc | it seems like I'm not the only one who got impatient |
| 13:59 | dv_ | from what I see they are getting flooded with requests |
| 13:59 | dv_ | its apparently more popular than expected |
| 14:00 | dv_ | which is both good and bad |
| 14:00 | dv_ | and its okay to ask this in #cubox , it is not really a dev channel anymore . the forum is preferred though. |
| 14:00 | rjc | dv_: that doesn't justify ignoring multiple customers' emails for months on end |
| 14:01 | dv_ | wish I had an answer to that. I am not a solidrun guy. |
| 14:01 | rjc | dv_: this way way they will actually loose more customers in the long run |
| 14:01 | rjc | this is my 2nd order (I have the original cubox too) with them and, sadly, the last |
| 14:02 | dv_ | sad, but I can understand |
| 14:02 | dv_ | I have the cubox-i4pro, and it is a wonderful piece of hardware. sad to see that logistics become a bottleneck |
| 14:03 | rjc | one big "We're overwhelmed with demand - stay tuned. We appreciate your patience" banner on their website would make a hell of a difference |
| 14:03 | dv_ | hmmm, thats actually a good idea. |
| 14:03 | dv_ | at least some kind of feedback for all |
| 14:03 | rjc | dv_: you reckon? ;^) |
| 14:03 | rjc | it's just that awkward silence on their part |
| 14:04 | rjc | it simply seems dodgy |
| 14:04 | dv_ | yes, I can see how this might look that way |
| 14:04 | dv_ | I'll try to forward this idea about the banner |
| 14:05 | rjc | not to mention the fact that when I was ordering it back in december (the same model as yours, btw) nowhere did I find an information: "We don't actually have these in stock!" |
| 14:05 | rjc | dv_: ta |
| 14:05 | dv_ | they were out of stock pretty quickly, yes |
| 14:06 | rjc | dv_: in this day and age one should be able to link stock numbers with online store |
| 14:07 | rjc | and if not, update the information within minutes or even hours after stock had been depleted |
| 14:07 | rjc | my experience so far: |
| 14:08 | rjc | 1. order placed in december - they've taken my money, no information about the lack of the product in stock |
| 14:09 | rjc | 2. email update at the beginning of january about dificulties with sourcing parts (sic!) |
| 14:09 | rjc | 3. my reply a couple of weeks after that - not head back |
| 14:10 | rjc | 4. 2nd reply to their email a couple of weeks ago - not heard back |
| 14:10 | dv_ | oh. I can see why you are angry. |
| 14:10 | rjc | 5. comment left on the website on 16th Feb - awaiting moderation (sic!) |
| 14:10 | dv_ | wish I could do more for you :/ |
| 14:11 | rjc | the conclusion to draw from the above is - we've taken your monies and we don't even have the courtesy to keep you in the loop |
| 14:12 | _rmk_ | rjc: I believe they /have/ been saying that demand is high, and there are long lead times |
| 14:12 | dv_ | _rmk_: the core problem I think is lack of communication |
| 14:12 | rjc | they might be using it for playing on the stock exchange for what I know |
| 14:12 | rjc | _rmk_: where exaclty? when I place an order, I would expect to know there and then |
| 14:12 | dv_ | of course they cannot send out status emails every day, but a banner on the forums or on the site about how they are overloaded does sound reasonable |
| 14:13 | dv_ | so I think its OK if they say it takes say 2 months, as long as you get feedback and are able to look into the current status |
| 14:14 | _rmk_ | rjc: http://cubox-i.com/stock-and-back-order-updates/ |
| 14:15 | dv_ | oh... okay, gotta admit I didnt know about this page |
| 14:15 | _rmk_ | it's in their blog, which I'll grant you is not easy to find |
| 14:15 | rjc | dv_: _rmk_ as I've mentioned, I ordered mine in december |
| 14:16 | rjc | if it takes them a month to figure out that they don't have any in stock, then it is even more concerning then I initially thought |
| 14:16 | _rmk_ | rjc: you're being really unfair on them. they only _started_ shipping in January |
| 14:17 | rjc | I have ordered mine in December - update after a month that they don't have any in stock is unacceptable |
| 14:17 | rjc | when it comes to two month wait time, I don't actuall mind - as long as I know that *prior* to making a purchase |
| 14:18 | rjc | and not finding our in due ourse ... a month later |
| 14:18 | _rmk_ | yes, so you keep saying, and repeating that really doesn't help your cause, because it's resulting in me getting pissed off at you. we're all volunteers here |
| 14:18 | rjc | _rmk_: why are you "getting pissed of" at me? |
| 14:19 | rjc | I don't have any beef with you |
| 14:19 | rjc | when did I ever direct anything personally at you? |
| 14:20 | rjc | _rmk_: take a chill pill, mate :^) |
| 14:20 | dv_ | you too rjc :) I understand why you are frustrated, and the need to vent |
| 14:21 | dv_ | but I can assure you that they wont just take your money and drive off with it |
| 14:21 | rjc | dv_: ;) I'm good, being kept in the dark simply makes me a bit edgy |
| 14:22 | dv_ | rjc: http://cubox-i.com/category/blog/ |
| 14:22 | dv_ | perhaps this helps a bit |
| 14:22 | rjc | dv_: I'm sure they won't - as I've mentioned before, the ordiginal cubox eventually arrived, albeit after a long wait |
| 14:23 | rjc | dv_: have seen it, have commented - comment awaiting moderation |
| 14:23 | rjc | all I would like is simply for someone to get back to me |
| 14:23 | rjc | that's all |
| 14:24 | rjc | with emails being ignored (for over a month), blog pot comments being moderated, I ran out of ideas - hence my visit here |
| 14:24 | dv_ | alright |
| 14:25 | dv_ | some people here are developers, some users, most are volunteers |
| 14:25 | rjc | dv_: sure, I understand that |
| 14:26 | rjc | however, I believe that there are actual Solid Run employees here too |
| 14:27 | rjc | it's to them that I wanted to get to |
| 14:28 | rjc | that's why I apologised at the very beginning if this is not the best place to have gone for answers - and I don't intend to spend monies to call Israel (as nothing else remains really) |
| 14:37 | _rmk_ | rjc: we can only tell you what we know... we've been helping solid-run with their various products for a few years, so we've seen what's been going on. |
| 14:37 | _rmk_ | rjc: there is only one Solid-Run employee here. |
| 14:38 | _rmk_ | rjc: and we all feel their pain in not being able to keep up with the demand |
| 14:45 | MikeSeth | yeah they underestimated the demand and overestimated the manufacturer capacity |
| 15:14 | _505 | rjc, did you try to mail Elinor directly? See post http://imx.solid-run.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=242&p=3446#p3446 |
| 15:18 | rjc | _505: no, I hadn't - I figured that, since they don't respond to a reply to an email which them themselves had sent, sending an email to each individual person is even less likely to succeed |
| 15:18 | rjc | _rmk_: thakns anyway |
| 15:20 | rjc | still, it was worth a try to seek answers here, even if only to let some steam off ;^) |
| 15:20 | rjc | nothing personal to any of you |
| 15:20 | rjc | I'm sure you do a great job here, which I'm yet to find out ... *after* my order arrives ;^) |
| 15:21 | rjc | thanks again for all comments |
| 15:21 | _rmk_ | just hang in there and be patient. |
| 15:21 | _rmk_ | it's always difficult when a small company launches what turns into a popular product |
| 15:29 | rjc | am, according to their earlier email I should have received my order by now (was meant to be shipped by the end of Jan) |
| 15:29 | rjc | and it's not as much as not meeting the deadliens but, and I can't stress it enough, very poor communication with customers |
| 15:30 | rjc | I do hope that there's a lesson to be learned from all of this for the future |
| 15:31 | rjc | as a side note, I'm still waiting for a couple of my Kickstarter bounties which are passed their deadlines, but at least I'm being kept in the loop by the project members |
| 15:31 | rjc | rjc, over and out |
| 15:31 | rjc | :) |
| 16:19 | kalasmannen | pwd |
| 16:19 | kalasmannen | oops |
| 17:21 | chron0 | ahoy fellow cuboxers |
| 17:53 | arden_ | hi, does anyone have an unbrick process for a cubox-1pro4 ? I can't seem to serial in either, when I power it on I get a quick flash of the red light and then nothing. I've tried re-flashing the sd card but still nothing. |
| 17:54 | _rmk_ | there is no unbrick process - there's no on-board memory |
| 17:54 | _rmk_ | it boots entirely off the SD card |
| 17:56 | arden_ | humm, I cant seem to get it to boot tho, it was working this morning, I loaded geexbox on the sdcard, setup xbmc, then started scanning my nfs shares, came back after about 4 hours and the light was off and the unit wont come back on since |
| 17:58 | _rmk_ | arden: I believe the red light coming on means it loaded the "SPL" part of uboot off the card... it going off again... hmm. |
| 17:58 | arden_ | serial just hangs, via putty, when i disconnect the usb cable I get a popup message saying error reading from serial device |
| 17:58 | arden_ | I've tried another card too |
| 17:59 | arden_ | I only got the device yesterday too haha, fun and games! |
| 18:00 | arden_ | I'll try throwing android 4.3 onto it instead of geexbox and see if theres any difference |
| 18:00 | _rmk_ | just wondering if you're suffering from a power brick failure... and wondering whether there's a way for you to check that |
| 18:01 | arden_ | aaa, whats the power brick failure? |
| 18:01 | _rmk_ | what happens to the optical out connector on the side? |
| 18:01 | arden_ | quick red flash |
| 18:02 | arden_ | then thast it |
| 18:02 | _rmk_ | so same as the red led on the front |
| 18:02 | arden_ | no red light on the front at all, there was this morning tho |
| 18:03 | _rmk_ | so the front red light never comes on? |
| 18:04 | arden_ | no, the front red light never comes on, only the optical red light comes on and the off again very fast |
| 18:06 | arden_ | ok, flashing the android img onto the sd card now, will give that a go in about 5 mins |
| 18:13 | arden_ | na, same issue :( |
| 18:33 | arden_ | yea, looks like a hardware issue, will try to find another power supply and see of that has anything to do with it |
| 20:13 | rabeeh | chron0: welcome to #cubox :) |
| 20:46 | unununium_ | Hello everybody! :) |
| 20:47 | unununium_ | I am a stupid person, needing a short help... Does Cubox-i4 have a serial output if no sd/usb/whatever has been connected? |
| 20:51 | jnettlet | unununium_, you need u-boot installed on the sdhc card to get terminal output. |
| 20:51 | _rmk_ | it has no internal memory, so it won't boot without a sd card |
| 20:54 | mk01 | unununium_: even the console & port definitions are stored within U-BOOT parameters. so no, you won't get serial console without card. |
| 20:54 | unununium_ | Thank you! |
| 20:55 | unununium_ | No the only open question is, where the sd card is, i was promised to get. :P (Yes, i think, it was forgotten. Shit happens.) |
| 20:55 | rabeeh | unununium_: one of the CBi design goal was to have zero non volatile storage on it |
| 20:56 | rabeeh | everything starts with the microsd |
| 20:56 | rabeeh | although the user manual mentions secondary boot; but i think no one touched that for now |
| 20:56 | rabeeh | for instance to have secondary boot on eSata CBi or mSata on HB |
| 20:58 | unununium_ | I want to use a micro sd anyways. ;) |
| 21:00 | unununium_ | Is there a limit to the size of the micro sd? |
| 21:01 | rabeeh | up to 64GB |
| 21:01 | rabeeh | i don't think one tested with 128GB; if there is any |
| 21:02 | unununium_ | Thank you! :) 64GB is more than enough. |
| 21:03 | unununium_ | Ah, found the right page in the wiki. I think, this solves a lot of problems! :) |
| 21:03 | rabeeh | i'm using 4GB to 64GB SanDisk |
| 21:05 | unununium_ | At the moment i only have 8gb anyways... will have to buy another one sooner or later. But for testing it is more than enough. |
| 21:06 | unununium_ | And I'm happy, that it arrived before i move. ;) By the end of this month this could have become a problem. |
| 21:24 | mk01 | rabeeh: what was the variable you was telling me last time that you set the initial boot device. what would allow skipping the u-boot procedures and load directly kernel from raw ? |
| 21:24 | rabeeh | it's a u-boot featured called Falcon mode |
| 21:25 | rabeeh | i haven't tested it though; but the idea is that SPL code directly boots the kernel (i'm not sure if it's zImage or something else) |
| 21:26 | mk01 | rabeeh: yes I'm looking at the docs already. thanks |
| 21:26 | rabeeh | mk01: tried Xbian last night |
| 21:26 | rabeeh | boots pretty fast; and the skin looks lighter from the xbmc default |
| 21:27 | rabeeh | had issues with the refresh rate change.. it did the switch but the playback was fast |
| 21:27 | mk01 | rabeeh: it is uImage, uboot needs to be recompiled to regenerate SPL. will try later. |
| 21:27 | rabeeh | i think it still thinks it should be 60hz; although the vsync now is 24hz |
| 21:29 | mk01 | rabeeh: what you have for TV and where are you reading the info from? this was tested only with my two screens and with xraxor. so definitely not enough. |
| 21:30 | rabeeh | mk01: Toshiba TV, supports 24,50,60 |
| 21:30 | rabeeh | content was 23.976 and TV configured to 24hz |
| 21:30 | mk01 | but it was working ok in the way movie 24 -> xbmc changed 24, tv showed 24 |
| 21:30 | rabeeh | yes. if i keep the 60hz movie plays ok |
| 21:31 | rabeeh | well.. it's a youtube 'HD trailer 300 second movie' |
| 21:31 | rabeeh | :) |
| 21:31 | mk01 | rabeeh: 23.976 -> 24.000 is set in advancedsettings.xml |
| 21:32 | mk01 | rabeeh: only tell me again if I understand it: tv switched to 24hz and movie was playing 3x faster > |
| 21:32 | mk01 | ? |
| 21:33 | rabeeh | yes :) |
| 21:33 | mk01 | OH |
| 21:33 | mk01 | ok |
| 21:34 | rabeeh | i think IPU was still configured as it was for 60hz |
| 21:34 | rabeeh | anyhow; i can't really find any of the xbian patches; do you have them somewhere? |
| 21:34 | rabeeh | i looked at the xbian github repo; but nothing CBi related |
| 21:35 | mk01 | can you send me xbmc.log ? with the changes to EGL IMX I was putting more logging specially around movie info -> what xbmc wants to change on screen -> how it is trying to change -> how it is read from ipu after the change |
| 21:35 | mk01 | rabeeh: so you run still clean old image ? |
| 21:35 | mk01 | rabeeh: just run apt-get update/upgrade |
| 21:36 | rabeeh | nop; new image |
| 21:36 | mk01 | rabeeh: or in CLI run xbian-config -> updates |
| 21:36 | rabeeh | latest |
| 21:36 | mk01 | rabeeh: I'm not regerating img very often |
| 21:36 | rabeeh | mk01: thats fine |
| 21:36 | rabeeh | lots of RPi notes still in the menus :) |
| 21:37 | rabeeh | do you have the repo somewhere online? |
| 21:37 | rabeeh | i'll look into those patches |
| 21:37 | mk01 | rabeeh: yes that's fine but you don;t have updates installed then. so install them |
| 21:37 | mk01 | img is from 02-Feb |
| 21:38 | rabeeh | i did the updates (apt-get update / upgrade) |
| 21:38 | mk01 | I was posting updates to almost everything two days ago |
| 21:38 | rabeeh | both from cli (that failed) and in the xbian-config it worked. |
| 21:38 | mk01 | rabeeh: I MISUNDERSTOOD you |
| 21:39 | mk01 | rabeeh: got the point now. you mean SOURCE patches |
| 21:39 | rabeeh | oh sorry; maybe i was not clear |
| 21:39 | rabeeh | yes; source patches to hack and review :) |
| 21:40 | mk01 | it is supposed to be in xbian-patches but you are right, cubox is missing still as I wasn't considering it even close to public release. |
| 21:41 | mk01 | rabeeh: but suprisingly the feedbacks are saying its playing better than OE and Geek so I should release them probably |
| 21:42 | mk01 | and PLEASE send me the xbmc log |
| 21:53 | mk01 | rabeeh: the main issue I consider it still as WIP is that as I integrated the res&freq switchings I got reports about CEC not working anymore. I can't test as I'm waiting for Samsung to change motherboard on my TV (by accident exactly CEC started not to work) ... and at the same time there are reports about some issues with Gotham nightlies and RCs. So I'm somehow stuck at the moment not able to track it down. |
| 21:53 | mk01 | rabeeh: but considering source patches, there are none to your kernel. it is all XBMC and included EGL |
| 21:54 | dv_ | mk01: are you in some connection with the wolfgar user from github? |
| 21:55 | dv_ | he is one of the people who have been developing xbmc IMX patches |
| 21:56 | mk01 | dv_: yes I know, it is all based on wolfgar's patches |
| 21:57 | mk01 | dv_: of course I wasn't reinventing the wheel again :D |
| 22:27 | chron0 | rabeeh: thanks, alredy reading up on some logs regarding gentoo on the cubox :) |
| 22:29 | chron0 | found some wiki and your talk with Wizzup about gentoo related issues and will setup another crossev toolchain for the cubox and see how far I can get :) |
| 22:30 | chron0 | I would guess your github repo holds the most feature rich kernel (as opposed to 3.3+ derivates) ? |
| 22:42 | mk01 | chron0: it depends on what you understand under "feature rich". if aim is on all Cubox's internal devices to be supported then yes, go with rabeeh's kernel. |
| 22:44 | chron0 | mk01: yes, that would be my understanding of feature ritch, meaning implemented support for plattform specific hardware and features :) my bad for being a bit unprecise :) |
| 23:35 | heap | hi is there easy way how to run in parallel on the cubox NAS, XBMC, OwnCloud and Voyage MPD? |
| 23:35 | heap | as i see all of them are as single apps customized on single OS. |
| 23:37 | mk01 | heap: not all. XBian is (pre)bundled XBMC with setups&configs integrated into XBMC to allow pure use as MediaStation but under is un-hacked Debian |
| 23:38 | mk01 | heap: or better to say un-broken Debian |
| 23:40 | heap | so its impossible to install one distro and run all services in parallel? and start xbmc on demand? |
| 23:43 | mk01 | heap: yes. as Cubox-i is still WIP there easiest for you would take .img and then disable XBMC autostart. otherwise you could just install the XBian's .deb over your system - but howto for XB/CBi is missing and if you are asking it means you need also the base system. So take XBian .img which is debootstraped Debian/Jessie. |
| 23:44 | mk01 | heap: including universal u-boot with spk |
| 23:44 | mk01 | spl |
| 23:46 | heap | well for nas and owncloud and apparently voyage MDP debian distro is needed. |
| 23:47 | heap | mk01: whats WIP? i have old cuboxpro |
| 23:48 | mk01 | heap: ok... then i'm not right. what I said is relevant for CBi |
| 23:48 | heap | and whats XB/CBi? whats XB ... sorry for those questions |
| 23:48 | mk01 | CBi = Cubox-i |
| 23:48 | heap | and XB? |
| 23:48 | mk01 | XBian |
| 23:49 | heap | ok so i was thinking if there is any package for cubox pro debian to run xbmc |
| 23:50 | heap | i saw Geexbox, but it looks like only for xbmc.. |
| 23:50 | heap | it is*, so im kind of confused |
| 23:50 | mk01 | I really don't know. I started with Cubox only with introduction of Cubox-i - that's also why I can't get used to think over them as two devices, what is apparently needed. |