03:08 | Coburn | seems rmk isn't here |
04:18 | aplund | I've been asking this in the forums, but I thought I'd have a go here: I found the diagrams showing the upper and lower board schematics for the cubox-i, but I cannot tell how things are connected to the microsom. Is there a schematic for this? My particular issue is how do you find out that the USB_OTG_ID is connected to the GPIO1 pin? |
04:22 | aplund | My only guess is that this is by some kind of elimination of possibilities. The only other pin that the iomux would let you put this on is ENET_RX_ER, but presumably that's already taken up by the Ethernet port (but there is nothing documenting this). |
05:56 | aplund | What's the best time to ask questions here? |
06:41 | pahartik | aplund: Any time is appropriate... If one wants to gather activity statistics, "FreeNode CuBox channel log" is available, seems to have UTC+0100 timestamps |
08:44 | SYS64738 | hi |
11:06 | rabeeh | apund: hi |
11:07 | rabeeh | i saw you previous messages |
11:26 | jnettlet | any one that speaks italian here? |
12:31 | rabeeh | no italians i guess |
12:35 | SYS64738 | I am |
12:36 | SYS64738 | Je suis |
12:44 | aplund | rabeeh: Oh cool!! Do you have any info for me? |
13:16 | aplund | still on the hunt for why uboot thinks that the first usb port is in OTG device mode when I have nothing plugged in |
13:17 | aplund | the results suggest that whatever is going on in GPIO1, it is making the PHY think that it should be in device mode |
13:19 | SIMOJFJ | Hi |
13:19 | meph1s|work | Hi SIMOJFJ |
13:19 | SIMOJFJ | I buy a Cubox-I4 and i dont see nothing in the screen |
13:20 | meph1s|work | which image did you've flashed on the card? |
13:20 | SIMOJFJ | i read all instructions to install the operative system and never run |
13:21 | SIMOJFJ | i try whith Archlinux and Android |
13:22 | SIMOJFJ | when i turn on the Cubox (no sd in the sloot) no see nothing in the screen, are this correct |
13:22 | meph1s|work | yes |
13:22 | meph1s|work | that's correct |
13:24 | SIMOJFJ | ok and now, My computer have Archlinux and Windows 8 - What I have to do to install the operating system |
13:24 | SIMOJFJ | i try the script in linux to create the sd and this fault |
13:26 | SIMOJFJ | sorry meph1s|work are you here? |
13:43 | meph1s|work | ehm.. yes.. |
14:03 | aplund | rabeeh: Definitely my bedtime. Let me know on the forums. Thanks. |
14:18 | rjc | hi all |
14:18 | rjc | I was looking on the web pages, including the wiki, but couldn't find the information |
14:19 | rjc | what's the top spect SD card that's supporte? |
14:19 | rjc | i.e. SDHC, SDXC, and what size |
14:19 | rjc | any info and/or links greatly appreciated |
14:33 | rjc | on a similar note - can anyone recommend a *good quality* and *small* power supply for the 4-core cubox-i? |
14:33 | rjc | I live in the UK so it has to have the appropriate plug |
14:34 | rjc | the cheeper the better but not to the extend of sacrificing on quality |
14:35 | rjc | thanks in advance |
14:35 | rabeeh | rjc: SDHC and SDXC up to 64GB are supported and tested |
14:35 | rabeeh | UHS-1 is also supported but only works on the lower speed modes. |
14:36 | rabeeh | i.e. normal speeds mode |
14:36 | rjc | rabeeh: thanks for a quick reply |
14:36 | rabeeh | notice that yesterday Sandisk announced first 128GB SDXC micro SD |
14:36 | rabeeh | i can't wait to get my hands on such a card :) |
14:36 | rjc | rabeeh: aha, that's basicaly what I was after, as I'm about to get a UHS-1 and was wondering if it's worth spending more |
14:37 | rjc | I did see that announcement too |
14:37 | rjc | :) |
14:37 | rjc | 64GB is enough for my needs though - everything else lives on a NAS |
14:37 | rjc | :) |
14:55 | rjc | OK, in that case, could you let me know if there's any point in buying SanDisk Extreme Pro, based on the details found on the manufacturer's website http://www.sandisk.co.uk/products/memory-cards/microsd/ ? |
14:56 | rjc | unless there's no gain whatsoever and Extreme Plus or Extreme would suffice? |
14:57 | rjc | basically, will I get 95MB/s, 80MB/s or 45MB/s read speed from CuBox? |
18:23 | jmontleon | jnettlet, where do you get the binary gpu driver you are using with your kernel? I see this stuff here, but don't know if it applies, and it one applies better than the others... http://repository.timesys.com/buildsources/g/gpu-viv-bin-mx6q |
18:24 | jmontleon | building a 3.10 kernel and hoping to see it in action |
18:24 | jnettlet | jmontleon, nah that is all outdated. You really need to dig through yocto stuff. let me put a tarball in my dropbox |
18:26 | jnettlet | https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/736509/i4pro/gpu-viv-bin-mx6q-3.10.17-1.0.0-beta-hfp.bin |
18:28 | jmontleon | nice. thank you! |
18:35 | jmontleo | 18:35 * jmontleon reads the wonderful lawyer speak and guess he won't be creating an rpm package for that |
18:35 | jnettlet | jmontleon, actually you can if you would like. |
18:36 | jmontleon | I would. I couldn't figure out if that was or wasn't aloud though :) |
18:36 | jnettlet | The beginning is very scary, but if you look the Vivante code it falls under different rules |
18:37 | jnettlet | and it says basically you can use the binaries on any system with Vivante hardware :-) |
18:38 | jnettle | 18:38 * jnettlet notates that he is not, has never been, nor never intends to practice law |
18:39 | jmontleon | :) |
18:42 | jmontleon | if this works I think I'll set up a 'stable' repo somewhere with 3.10, the brcmfmac bluetooth stuff, and the gpu binary driver and a devel one with the 3.14r-rc4 and better stuff |
18:42 | jmontleon | until someday everything is in the upstream kernel and nobody needs it anymore |
18:43 | jnettlet | that is why I based it on Linaro's 3.10 LTS kernel. 2 years of critical updates, so it can just work for a while |
18:43 | jmontleon | makes sense |
18:45 | jmontleon | I might have even started with the 3.10 one first if I had known about it prior to going crazy with 3.13. But I figured, one at a time and not make myself _too_ crazy all at once |
19:18 | jmontleon | jnettlet, any idea what might be the problem here: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/81010/52504513/ |
19:19 | jnettlet | jmontleon, looks like I missed a patch. I am still working on KMS |
19:19 | jnettlet | let me take a quick looks I have them all broken out. |
19:34 | jnettlet | jmontleon, can you test this? https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/736509/0001-drm-BrokeIt-include-defines-that-got-clipped-in-prev.patch |
19:34 | jnettlet | my auto-backporting script ran into a problem and clipped that directory. Stupid programmer |
19:35 | jmontleon | trying it now |
19:36 | jmontleon | yes, looks like it's proceeding with that :) |
19:46 | jnettlet | jmontleon, you may also want to enable f2fs and zswap support in your kernels |
19:47 | jmontleon | good to know. I will do that |
19:50 | jmontleon | jnettlet, do I need to remove -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ? http://paste.fedoraproject.org/81021/39352700/ |
19:51 | jnettlet | looks like another patch let me look |
19:57 | jnettlet | jmontleon, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/736509/0001-include-i2c.h-Forgot-my-notes-on-the-i2c-fixup.patch |
19:57 | jnettlet | two screw ups out of 1700 patches isn't too bad :-) |
19:57 | jmontleon | nope :) |
19:58 | jmontleon | giving it another try |
19:58 | jnettle | 19:58 * jnettlet was planning on tackling KMS testing this weekend. |
19:59 | jas-hacks | jnettlet: did you apply all/most of the fsl patches on your 3.10 kernel ? |
19:59 | jnettlet | jmontleon, oh you may need to tweak the device-tree file as well. That is something I know I have to look into for KMS/fbdev to co-exist |
20:00 | jnettlet | jas-hacks, a lot of. I applied 1054 of 17xx patches |
20:00 | jnettlet | If stuff had been upstreamed I favoured that patch |
20:00 | jas-hacks | jnettlet: that must of been fun ;) |
20:32 | jmontleon | jnettlet, have another it looks like: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/81037/35294771/ |
20:44 | jnettlet | jmontleon, that error doesn't make any sense. |
20:46 | jnettlet | jmontleon, you can try adding a #include to the top |
20:47 | jnettlet | don't know why that would be missing though |
20:49 | jmontleon | yes, that did it |
20:49 | jmontleon | but now: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/81045/93530478/ |
21:08 | jnettlet | jmontleon, at this point I think you should probably let the KMS driver go until I go through it this weekend |
21:08 | jnettlet | the merge obviously didn't come over clean. |
21:09 | jmontleon | no problem. I agree one or two is not a big deal, but with such a large number to potentially be a problem this could get old fast |
21:09 | jmontleon | thanks for your help though |
21:09 | jnettlet | jmontleon, there is a cubox specific config in my repo that I recommend everyone use. |
21:10 | jmontleon | I'll take a look |
21:10 | jnettlet | that kernel and the vivante-imx Xorg driver is the combo that will give proper 3d acceleration under X for now. |
22:52 | heap_ | hi, which deb is the most up to date for cuboxpro 1? |
22:56 | heap_ | 1000 versions of varius OSes for cubox .. but no core distro with packages like xbmc, mpd ah ... |
23:00 | heap_ | so buy 10 cuboxes.. install each with specific embeded OS and at total its same like one pc with consumption etc.. |
23:34 | heap_ | :: Starting full system upgrade... |
23:34 | heap_ | :: Replace libusbx with core/libusb? [Y/n] |
23:34 | heap_ | do you have any idea which one to use for arch? |
23:40 | heap_ | y |
23:58 | dot_ | rabeeh: hi - I found your post in forum and want to ask if theres a drop in package with 5Ghz variant of BCM4329 (http://imx.solid-run.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=37#p226) |