09:38 | bewees | Can the cubox-i4Pro actually do 470 Mbps? Is there a working driver for the 470 Mbps in arm linux OSes? |
09:40 | jnettlet | bewees, I have actually max'd out ioperf at 530Mbps |
09:41 | jnettlet | sorry iperf |
09:41 | jnettlet | been using ioperf earlier so it is in fingers muscle memory |
09:41 | bewees | jnettlet What linux distru did you use? |
09:42 | jnettlet | bewees, a bunch of different ones. It isn't dependent on userspace. |
09:44 | Koma | rabeeh: thank you for the interest but no, I'm probably going to buy an cubox 4 pro but I want to monitor the everyday problems here in chan |
09:44 | Koma | before making the buy |
09:46 | jnettlet | problems? What problems? |
09:46 | jnettlet | nonsense |
09:47 | bewees | jnettlet Good to know, thanks. I |
09:56 | jnettlet | bewees, I would like to note that currently the downstream and upstream speeds are different. RX is faster and can get over 500Mbps, TX is more around 400Mbps. We are still investigating that. |
10:06 | bewees | Thanks for mentioning that. 450-500 Mbps RX would suffice me, I am just considering my network setup, where my powerline adapter could be rather the limiting factor than the cubox. I get a gigabit switch to test the speed of my powerline connection, if it's capable of around 400 Mbps TX then I could use the cubox as a decent backup system solution. Else I could try a dual band (600 mbit/s) wlan |
10:06 | bewees | stick. |
10:07 | bewees | (The cubox would be connect through ethernet, just the backup clients aren't connected via ethernet cable. |
10:15 | bewees | I am little confused about this information "There is no on/off button as the CuBox-i is an always on computer." I think the cubox can be powered off with `shutdown -h now`? And if I want to start it up again I'd pull off the power plug and then put it back in? |
10:29 | _505 | bewees, correct. but shutdown -h doesn't really do anything. it will stop the kernel, but the cubox-i is still on, although you cannot do anything with it until you power-cycle it |
10:53 | bewees | _505 If the kernel stopped, will the cubox draw less power than in idle with a running kernel? |
11:01 | _505 | not quite sure. Of course it will draw the minimum amount possible, but if the kernel is on and idle, I don't think the power consumption is that much higher. |
11:01 | dv_ | i doubt it |
11:02 | dv_ | i think with proper power management settings you can achieve the EU norms for standby anyway |
11:05 | bewees | I see, then the only thing I'd have to worry about is the 4 watt idle of my HDD. So I'd have to hack something like, "if the cubox's kernel is down then power off the 12V external psu of the hdd' |
11:10 | jnettlet | bewees, not yet officially. I plan on making halt turn off off all the cores but core0, disable DDR and ports and only run some code from iram with the soc running at its lowest bus speed. |
11:21 | bewees | jnettlet I see, so the kernel would be shut down, but the arm's cores are still running. If it's possible I could connect a mosfet to a gpio of the cubox and run a script before shutting of the kernel, so that the GPIO pin would be low if turned off, which will switch the mosfet and turn off the psu of the hdd |
11:25 | jnettlet | bewees, yes although the cubox-i doesn't have any gpios exposed. A hummingboard when they are shipped would be easier. |
11:25 | jnettlet | your other option would be to use the 5volts on a usb port to trigger a relay that would power/unpower your hdd |
11:26 | jnettlet | I plan on doing that to power/unpower my hummingboard by my tv's usb port because it doesn't support CEC |
11:29 | bewees | jnettlet Ah, the hummingboard is just like the cubox-i4Pro without case? |
11:29 | jnettlet | bewees, I don't think it will have the quad-core soc in it, as that really needs a good thermal design. I think a dual-core with 2gb will be available |
11:30 | dv_ | bewees: the HB is a raspberry pi clone |
11:30 | dv_ | well it has the same microSOM as the cubox-i , but the carrier board is different |
11:30 | bewees | dv_ According to these specs that's not true: http://imx.solid-run.com/wiki/index.php?title=HummingBoard_Hardware (Got 1 gbit/s, spif etc) |
11:31 | dv_ | from the form factor it is |
11:31 | bewees | Ah I see what you mean |
11:31 | jnettlet | bewees, but the header has lots of gpio and some i2c |
11:32 | bewees | jnettlet So it's basically the CuBox-i2Ultra with 2gb ram and without case :) |
11:32 | bewees | (and different form factor) |
11:32 | jnettlet | bewees, I believe so. Don't quote me on the 2GB I haven't seen the final specs. They should be out within the next couple of weeks |
11:33 | bewees | I see, didn't find the hummingboard on cubox website, so I will check later again, thanks. |
11:34 | jnettlet | bewees, soonish |
11:34 | jnettlet | I don't know how urgent your project is. |
11:35 | bewees | It's a network backup solution, it could wait 2 weeks |
11:35 | bewees | Do you know the pricing already for the hummingboard? |
11:36 | bewees | (Worst case I could consider to open up the cubox-i4pro case and find a gpio from there) |
11:36 | _Rarity | Hello. I'm installing Arch on my cubox i4Pro (as debian network wont work). I'm following this installation guide: http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv7/freescale/cubox-i . In step 8, they want me to copy a SPL file, which doesn't seem to exist. Should I ignore it? |
11:37 | mk01 | _Rarity: definitely no ignore |
11:44 | _Rarity | mk01: Thanks for the answer, I know the command is there for a reason, but I simply cant find any occurence of an "SPL" file |
11:45 | LangeOortjes | _Rarity: I am using Arch and the SPL and u-boot files from https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B1Cqcbb-UsxzN0FQcWNMQ0JLOFE |
11:46 | mk01 | _Rarity: http://imx.solid-run.com/wiki/index.php?title=Building_the_kernel_and_u-boot_for_the_CuBox-i_and_the_HummingBoard |
11:49 | LangeOortjes | _Rarity: The way I read the installation document provided by archlinuxarm, it should ship with an SPL and u-boot file |
11:50 | LangeOortjes | _Rarity: They are definitely on there: tar -ztvf Downloads/ArchLinuxARM-imx6-cubox-latest.tar.gz | grep SPL |
11:50 | LangeOortjes | -rw-r--r-- 0 root root 39936 Feb 19 00:44 ./boot/SPL |
11:51 | zaher | _Rarity, the files should be in /boot or /root/boot |
11:52 | LangeOortjes | _Rarity: aaah I see where the guide goes wrong! |
11:52 | LangeOortjes | _Rarity: in step 7 you are asked to move the files in root/boot/* to boot, so SPL and u-boot.img will be situated in the boot directory you created in step 4 |
11:52 | zaher | _Rarity: look at the wiki pages http://imx.solid-run.com/wiki/index.php?title=ArchLinux |
11:52 | LangeOortjes | _Rarity: the commands in step 8 should then read |
11:53 | LangeOortjes | dd if=boot/SPL of=/dev/sdX bs=512 seek=2 |
11:53 | LangeOortjes | dd if=boot/u-boot.img of=/dev/sdX bs=1K seek=42 |
11:54 | _Rarity | Lange0ortjes: Ah yes, thats it! |
11:55 | _Rarity | Thanks |
11:56 | LangeOortjes | _Rarity: np |
11:56 | zaher | jnettlet: I compiled your 3.10 kernel for the HB. Everything seems to work except that I get no signal on hdmi after uboot |
11:57 | jnettlet | zaher, can you post the output of dmesg? |
11:57 | zaher | jnettlet: just a sec |
11:59 | zaher | jnettlet: here http://pastebin.ca/2650283 |
12:00 | jnettlet | zaher, oh yeah I have a patch for that, that is on a solo board. |
12:00 | zaher | yes, the old dev board |
12:01 | zaher | can I have it please :) |
12:01 | jnettlet | no |
12:01 | jnettlet | :-) just kidding |
12:01 | jnettlet | http://pastebin.com/1sc0Db1b |
12:02 | jnettlet | just the .dts, so patch it recompile the dts and then copy it to your sd card. |
12:02 | jnettlet | now reason to rebuild the kernel |
12:02 | zaher | great, thanks. I'll try that tonight. |
12:03 | jnettlet | I will push these changes sometime today. |
12:04 | bewees | jnettlet For the hummingboard I can also use archlinux image and update the kernel automatically through pacman or do I have to compile my own kernel as zaher did? |
12:04 | jnettlet | bewees, I don't know anything about arch sorry |
12:05 | zaher | bewees: pepedog is doing a great job at packaging things quickly for CBi/HB |
12:06 | bewees | Hm I see, I think the arch packages shouldn't differ between CBi and HB (I hope) |
12:06 | zaher | usually not :) |
12:06 | zaher | except in my case. |
12:06 | jnettlet | nope, should just be different device-tree files. Which if you use the latest u-boot gets detected automatically with the default environment |
12:06 | bewees | zaher I thought the HB is going to be releases in 2 weeks, do you have already an older version of HB? |
12:07 | zaher | I have an old development version. Not production. |
12:07 | bewees | Ah I see |
12:07 | jnettlet | there is no production version of the HB |
12:07 | jnettlet | yet |
12:08 | jnettlet | really, we should call the old prototype the old name, the C1. It is pretty different from the production HB |
12:09 | bewees | jnettlet Cracking open the CBi4pro is possible or not recommendable? (for the gpios= |
12:09 | kalasmannen | date +%Y-%m-%d_%h-%m |
12:09 | kalasmannen | oh yeah |
12:09 | kalasmannen | wrong window AND wrong syntax |
12:10 | jnettlet | bewees, well it voids your warranty. You can do it. You have to be very careful. |
12:11 | bewees | I see, I'll wait the 2-3 weeks for the production version of the HB and if the pricing is less than the CBi4pro I'll choose the HB, else I'd risk voiding my warranty with the cbi4pro |
12:12 | jnettlet | bewees, probably wise. |
12:12 | jnettlet | the Hummingboard is definitely more of a hackers board. |
14:37 | LangeOortjes | should the new u-boot automatically boot into a zImage with corresponding dtb? |
14:38 | tomlohave-away | LangeOortjes: yes |
14:38 | jnettlet | yes, if it is on the first partition in / or /boot and you have not saved an early environment in u-boot |
14:39 | LangeOortjes | jnettlet: ah it's probably my previous u-boot configuration then |
14:57 | LangeOortjes | Alright that worked, maybe a short explanation on resetting the u-boot environment to the default values would be nice. |
14:58 | rjc | hi all |
14:59 | LangeOortjes | rjc: hi |
14:59 | rjc | could someone, please, advise - which *Extreme* models are overkill for CuBox-i http://www.sandisk.co.uk/products/memory-cards/microsd/ |
15:00 | rjc | I'm about to get a new card and was wondering if it's worth the money to get a high-end one |
15:01 | rjc | what I'm basically after is whether I'll get the stated r/w speed under CuBox-i |