IRC log of #cubox of Mon 24 Mar 2014. All times are in CET < Back to index

01:53 _baronK Can anyone in here assist in getting my cubox-i up installed with debian wheezy? I've done it before but I'm hitting snags right now during the debootstrap --second-stage step.
04:18 nikitis is rabeeh here?
10:12 aplund jnettlet: found the reason for the spdif pins not being muxed right, see email.
10:21 Tenkawa so... anyone running a cubox-i ultra2?
10:21 Tenkawa trying to determine if its sata support is decent
10:27 rabeeh Tenkawa: yes
11:45 satellit_e Is the android microSD card shipped with my CuBox-i4P-300 D MAC the same as the android listed on your wiki? (It works well and I wanted a 2nd copy)
11:46 satellit_e 4.3 android build no 1.00-rc2
11:47 Coolgeek why don't you make a backup of your sdcard ?
11:49 satellit_e Coolgeek: already entered information in mail and contacts so too late
11:50 satellit_ 11:50 * satellit_e testing
13:58 rabeeh satellit_e: same image
14:01 davorin ah welcome rabeeh (o;
14:02 rabeeh davorin: hey
14:09 davorin this is the one i'm selling for the rpi:
14:19 satellit rabeeh: thanks
14:21 satelli 14:21 * satellit wish debian had networking working + ubuntu is low res screen only (testing here)
14:22 satelli 14:22 * satellit HDMI output
16:24 MarcusVinter Hey.
16:24 rabeeh hi Marcus
16:24 MarcusVinter I'm a bit confused if anyone can clarify something for me. It's nothing major, just confusing with the spec.
16:24 MarcusVinter I'll get the details, one sec.
16:24 rabeeh go ahead
16:26 MarcusVinter On the website spec comparison here: http://cubox-i.com/products/ It shows the I2Ultra doesn't have wifi/bluetooth.
16:26 MarcusVinter Ours does?
16:26 MarcusVinter lol
16:26 rabeeh hehe..
16:27 rabeeh i'll pass the information right on
16:27 MarcusVinter Is it the website that's wrong? Or did we get sent a different type?
16:31 satellit_e Is it possible to set the CuBox-4P wifi to act as an access point?
16:31 satellit_e i4P*
16:31 rabeeh satellit_e: look at the forums about that
16:32 rabeeh pepedog (Arch) had some success on that; it's mainly a firmware issue
16:32 satellit_e ok we are trying to use it as a schoolserver
16:32 rabeeh i personally hadn't had time to play with the AP modes
16:32 satellit_e fedora 20
16:32 rabeeh satellit_e: oh; so you are one of jnettlet friends? :)
16:32 satellit_e yes I test for XSCE
16:33 rabeeh oh great !
16:36 satellit http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Advanced_Topics#CuBox-i4 FYI
16:37 rabeeh yeah; i'v seen that
16:38 satellit k
16:38 rabeeh but is the SugarOS running on it already? or they just have F20 on it?
16:38 rabeeh that's a unit that was sent to Daniela Carrara (SugarOS maintainer)
16:39 satellit I did an unsuccessful server install with ansible f18 is normally used so It boots f20 as server but has somw problems to solve to work as schoolserver
16:39 satellit see last screenshot on page
16:40 satellit I have the unit here in Bend Oregon and it works
16:40 satellit links are there to D/L also
16:42 satelli 16:42 * satellit I am a volunteer here with my own i4P
16:42 rabee 16:42 * rabeeh salutes satellit
18:01 purch which xbmc distro for i4?
18:09 MarcusVinter http://download.solid-run.com/pub/solidrun/cubox-i/GeexBox-xbmc/geexbox-devel-20131212-r16611.cuboxi/geexbox-devel-20131212-r16611.cuboxi-patched-cubox-i4pro.img.zip
18:09 jnettlet satellit, AP mode is not working 100% yet. I have some patches that I have been directed to test against it.
18:10 jnettlet I have it to the point that it switches to AP mode and broadcasts beacons but won't let clients associate
18:10 jnettlet purch, I am working most closely with geexbox, but all of them are doing an excellent job
18:12 purch I have used rasbian, openelec, etc on rpi, but some are too cleaned up; like no package installers
18:12 jnettlet geexbox has opkg on the cli
18:12 purch opkg like debs?
18:12 jnettlet yes
18:12 purch nice
18:13 jnettlet I am working with them to expand the repo, if you want to join the community you are more than welcome
18:13 purch Can you sell some time to me? =)
18:14 jnettlet tell me about it.
18:15 purch is it easy to put desktop to geexbox?
18:15 purch or should I just stick to to sd cards for demonstration purposes?
18:15 purch to two sd cards
18:16 jnettlet I would do two sd cards for now. I do have a plan to run a desktop and xbmc side by side using docker, but I haven't had time to finish my work.
18:17 jnettlet I want to make most distros, and appliance/mediacenter applications available via docker/LXC containers
18:17 jnettlet then you will just need 1 sdcard :-)
18:17 purch have to look at those
18:17 purch I use dual seat (2 x gpu) on my media center now
18:21 purch ok, that docker looks interesting
18:22 jnettlet I am integrating that with a fast boot image based on openbricks which is what geexbox runs on
18:23 jnettlet if you come up with some containers they should run on my fastboot image soonish. Like by the weekend
19:17 mk01 rebeeh: are you there ?
19:19 rabeeh here
19:19 mk01 yup
19:19 rabeeh hey
19:44 kaipee using Arch ARM - when I get the notice
19:44 kaipee You will probably need to copy /boot/uImage to the first partition
19:44 kaipee ...so I actually need to do that?
19:44 kaipee isn't the first partition mounted as /boot ?
19:45 mk01 usually this is the case
19:45 kaipee meaning I shouldn't need to move uImage?
19:45 mk01 you can check that with "findmnt /boot"
19:46 mk01 (if part1 is actually mounted under /boot)
19:46 kaipee yeah /dev/mmcblk0p1 is mounted as /boot (vfat)
19:46 mk01 you got the notice during some package (kernel?) installation ?
19:46 kaipee so the kernel update automatically unpack to the first partition (I can just ignore?)
19:47 kaipee yes kernel update (linux-imx6-cubox-dt
19:47 mk01 probably yes. the issue is likely in the VFAT. don't know how Arch is working exactly, but for instance dpkg (Debian deb) is doing some symlinks during install process
19:48 mk01 and VFAT is not supporting such operations.
19:48 mk01 so you get "warnings" or errors
19:48 mk01 I assume this is also the reason why you got notice
19:49 kaipee so it doesn't move uImage automatically?
19:49 mk01 yes, could be. DPKG can't do that if target file exists and the fstype is for instance FAT.
19:50 kaipee ...if the file is saved as /boot/uImage , and /dev/mmcblk0p1 is mounted as /boot
19:51 kaipee how can I manually move the file?
19:51 mk01 then you are fine ;)
19:51 kaipee even though /boot is vfat?
19:52 kaipee (mmcblk0p1 is vfat)
19:53 kaipee ls /boot shows
19:53 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5293392 Mar 17 15:52 uImage
19:53 mk01 kaipee: don't stick 100% to my assumptions based on different package engine (dpkg). I have never seen Arch running. with DPKG it would be needed to move /boot/uImage (or rename or delete), then install .deb package.
19:53 mk01 kaipee: you can test like this
19:53 mk01 do "umount /boot"
19:53 mk01 ls -la /boot
19:53 mk01 should be empty
19:54 mk01 then "mount /dev/mmcblk0p1 /boot"
19:54 mk01 ls -la /boot
19:54 mk01 you should again see uImage
19:54 mk01 if it is there, you are OK
19:54 mk01 ;)
19:54 kaipee I know that it is there
19:54 kaipee I don't know if it is the file that I just updated...
19:55 mk01 you can unpack the package manually
19:55 mk01 is it .opk ?
19:55 kaipee how?
19:55 kaipee where is it temporarily stored?
19:56 kaipee I don't know, I just ran a system update with 'pacman -Syyu'
19:56 kaipee and it downloaded kernel image and unpacked it
19:56 mk01 if you remember the package name
19:57 mk01 you can "opkg download "
19:58 kaipee this is for Arch Linux ARM, not GeexBox
19:58 kaipee Arch doesn't use the opkg package manager
19:58 mk01 ok
19:58 mk01 pacman -Sw b43-fwcutter
19:58 mk01 this I found as -> download package without installing
19:59 jnettlet kaipee, mk01, the main b43-fwcutter site is serving garbage.
19:59 jnettlet I just had to debug this for geexbox
19:59 mk01 jnettlet: it was only copy paste important was "packman -Sw" part.
20:00 mk01 sorry for nonsense package name ;)
20:00 jnettlet I switched it to http://bues.ch/b43/fwcutter/
20:00 kaipee jnettlet I'm not interested in b43-fwcutter
20:00 jnettlet oh...haha funny coincidence
20:00 mk01 kaipee: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/pacman
20:03 kaipee mk01 I copied the package from /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-imx6-cubox-dt-3.10.30-9-armv7h.pkg.tar.xz
20:03 kaipee and extracted
20:04 kaipee under ~/boot it only lists zImage - not uImage
20:05 mk01 kaipee: only zImage or even more files ?
20:05 kaipee drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 24 16:00 .
20:05 kaipee -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43332 Mar 24 16:00 imx6dl-cubox-i.dtb
20:05 kaipee -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42379 Mar 24 16:00 imx6dl-hummingboard.dtb
20:05 kaipee -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43789 Mar 24 16:00 imx6q-cubox-i.dtb
20:06 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5981416 Mar 24 16:00 zImage
20:06 mk01 copy all to /boot
20:07 kaipee mk01 it looks like they were all automatically copied to boot. I was just concerned about the uImage warning (becasue uImage was showing an older file date
20:07 kaipee drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16384 Jan 1 1970 .
20:07 kaipee drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Mar 23 22:33 ..
20:07 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 39936 Mar 4 14:26 SPL
20:07 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 43332 Mar 24 16:00 imx6dl-cubox-i.dtb
20:07 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42379 Mar 24 16:00 imx6dl-hummingboard.dtb
20:07 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 43789 Mar 24 16:00 imx6q-cubox-i.dtb
20:07 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 295820 Mar 4 14:26 u-boot.img
20:07 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 149 Mar 23 22:49 uEnv.txt
20:07 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5293392 Mar 17 15:52 uImage
20:07 kaipee -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5981416 Mar 24 16:00 zImage
20:07 kaipee ^ that's /boot
20:08 mk01 kaipee: what I would do is making backup of /boot, reformatting /boot with mkfs.ext2 /dev/mmcblk0p1, then moving the files back.
20:08 mk01 then reinstall the package
20:09 kaipee why? It looks like the kernel update only included a few files and they all look to be moved to /boot (all dated Mar 24 16:00)
20:09 mk01 (so you won't be needed to each time manually process the files)
20:10 kaipee doesn't boot partition need to be vfat for?
20:10 kaipee most cubox-i scripts make it vfat
20:10 mk01 no. in actual u-boot version is ext4 driver
20:11 mk01 able to work with ext2/3/4
20:11 kaipee ah right, OK
20:11 kaipee is there some reason why the guides specifiy vfat?
20:11 mk01 kaipee: no idea. maybe for easier recovery
20:12 mk01 as windows will not read it.
20:12 mk01 (so you can't just take SD out, plug it into windows machine and manage its content)
20:13 mk01 kaipee: the operation is 1 minute and you would see if you get the notice again
20:13 kaipee hmm, I'll have a check to see if they have configured something specificaly for vfat
20:42 mal- mk0
20:43 mal- mk01
20:44 twouters hi, i'm running geexbox on cuboxi with linux-imx_3.10.30_linaro-stable+a305f2d8f6-8 and i would like to control the front led
20:45 twouters i've noticed that /sys/class/leds/imx6\:red\:front/trigger doesn't exist though
20:45 mal- http://imx.solid-run.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=874
20:45 twouters is this something that i should enable somewhere?
20:45 mal- oh dunno
20:45 twouters nice, relevant though :)
20:46 twouters i've seen some commits in openbricks repo about this, that's why i thought it should be there
21:04 twouters # CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS is not set
21:04 twouters it isn't enabled in the geexbox build
21:48 Tenkawa i might go pick up a cubox-i ultra2 tonight.. any pointers/tips?
21:55 Tenkawa brb(if my kernel rebuld went well)
22:46 kaipee Tenkawa still aaround?
23:31 Tenkawa I decided if I go with a cubox I'm going to go with the quad so one curiosity I have is, Is 3.0 still the newest kernel branch that will run on it?
23:45 freinhard hi!
23:46 freinhard can someone supply the hdparm -tT output of an attached 3.5" sata disk and/or usb disk?
23:51 kaipee Tenkawa I'm running 3.10.30
23:51 kaipee (Arch ARM)