23:59 | mk001 | heap_: no. it just really looks the box has problems to manage state with drives being off and/or powering them up |
00:00 | mk001 | normally I would not make big issue even from error EACH time on wake up. so what. you waits 10s longer. but you said sometimes it all just dies - with reboot needer or wha |
00:00 | mk001 | what |
00:00 | heap_ | that error happened 11x |
00:01 | mk001 | heap_: man wait wait. in the 5 years only 11x ? |
00:01 | heap_ | mk001: yes today it completely died. |
00:01 | heap_ | mk001: no not in 5 years |
00:01 | heap_ | mk001: during the last 5 hours |
00:01 | mk001 | ok then. I would kill you otherwise :D |
00:01 | mk001 | then we are still friends :) |
00:01 | heap_ | :) |
00:02 | mk001 | so really just to wrap up |
00:02 | heap_ | what im wondering is why it stopped |
00:02 | heap_ | for now |
00:02 | heap_ | bc same operation is running ... that rsync.... |
00:02 | heap_ | its still in progress |
00:02 | mk001 | I can imagine throwing error after wakeup / small freeze timeout IF only it goes up properly |
00:02 | mk001 | if NOT , throw it away |
00:05 | mk001 | (at the end, when I was looking for PCIE sata/esata expansion board (with at least 6 ports), I had to buy four boards until I got one working as I wanted) |
00:06 | mk001 | none of rockwell chips worked ok, finally I ended up with ASMEDIA chip ... I don't know I have that machine at all. |
00:07 | mk001 | another alternative is to buy rackmount SAS enclosure and some proper adaptec SAS multiport controllers |
00:08 | mk001 | and connect it cross 2+2 (so four lines across mirrored controllers) |
00:08 | mk001 | then you will not see such errors |
00:08 | mk001 | :D |
00:08 | mk001 | ~10k without drives |
00:11 | mk001 | jnettlet: those 2 x Port dedicated Ethernet Clearfog base are as written, unstitched two separe ports , right ? |
00:12 | mk001 | unstitched = unswitched |
00:12 | heap_ | mk001: hmhm not clear... but one might end up to buy qnap ;/ |
00:13 | mk001 | heap_: it's personal opinion - but with those you get another kinds of problems |
00:13 | mk001 | but it's always a balance , consensus, yes |
00:17 | heap_ | mk001: what kind of other problems do you mean?:) |
00:20 | mk001 | not expandable, limited by closed source (and mostly without further development) management software, services messed up by producer company, many times not following official standards, ... (again personal opinion) it's anything but flexible / lifetime solution |
00:21 | heap_ | now it happend again blah |
00:21 | heap_ | mk001: yeah u are right .. hard to make a compromis |
00:22 | mk001 | mk001: but on the othe rhand have to admit - for a user not keen in tech, or not having that time to care himself |
00:22 | mk001 | it is A WAY to go |
00:22 | mk001 | honestly |
00:23 | mk001 | I bought one to mother having over 65 .... |
00:23 | heap_ | same issues i have with osx and mac... literally i hate that os and machine. |
00:24 | mk001 | :))) |
00:24 | mk001 | I have ONLY macs, and . would never ever change. |
00:24 | mk001 | but |
00:24 | mk001 | since 10.6 I get what you mean :D |
00:25 | mk001 | what progresses over the gens is the spinning wheel I renamed to spinlock wheel . and it even gets BIGGER with each osx release :D |
00:27 | heap_ | mk001: do you use osx? |
00:27 | heap_ | mk001: are u american? |
00:27 | mk001 | you perhaps had no chance to use 10.4, or 10.5, with clean mach kernel and simple X on it - where a locked UI was unknown event ... |
00:27 | mk001 | nope. EU |
00:28 | heap_ | oh ok |
00:28 | mk001 | but I was like shredding books in 1y tops |
00:28 | mk001 | since I started with macs, I have all of them still working |
00:28 | heap_ | mk001: nah i started with 10.10 and its pain. |
00:28 | mk001 | heap_: unfortunatelly I have to agree with you. |
00:29 | heap_ | so why u use osx? |
00:29 | heap_ | i read that linus torvald uses linux on apple hw |
00:29 | heap_ | i was thinking about same but not idea if its workable |
00:30 | mk001 | still there is no faster UI for me than those perfect UI combo + multigestures on top of GNU base, but with fast here I mean :able to be used fast: .... otherwise goes worse each year |
00:30 | heap_ | mk001: well see i dont know how use that UI |
00:31 | heap_ | u cant do anything with Finder |
00:31 | heap_ | for example |
00:31 | mk001 | heap_ it is perfectly workable. even funny fact - HW with lowest downtimes for Windows |
00:31 | mk001 | is MAC |
00:31 | heap_ | mk001: workable what? apple hw + linux? |
00:32 | mk001 | or apple hw + win if you need so. |
00:32 | mk001 | but I have travelled so many brands in my lifetime |
00:32 | heap_ | oh but is it really stable? |
00:32 | heap_ | to use win / lin on apple hw? |
00:32 | mk001 | and practically don't see ONE argument why I should stop buying it in future |
00:32 | mk001 | HW with lowest downtimes for Windows is MAC |
00:33 | heap_ | :) |
00:33 | mk001 | even according to MS stats |
00:33 | heap_ | question is if u can make works all drivers etc |
00:33 | heap_ | mk001: but problem with osx and ui is that its hard to work with it easily....no files explorer etc |
00:33 | mk001 | even when apple migrated to intel hw |
00:33 | mk001 | it is still CLOSED hw platform |
00:33 | heap_ | mk001: how do you backup all your apple laptops? |
00:34 | mk001 | there is nothing like HW with no driver |
00:34 | mk001 | because there is very small portfolio of HW |
00:34 | mk001 | :)) |
00:34 | heap_ | mk001: i know but u can experience issues |
00:34 | heap_ | mk001: how u backup and what do u use as file explorer? |
00:35 | mk001 | mine fileexplorer is text console + midnight commander |
00:35 | mk001 | backups are something like worth of half of reasons why buy MAC |
00:36 | heap_ | mk001: ok same here... terminal + mc but i wanted something nice in gui |
00:36 | mk001 | (if you again stick to only one oficial way to do it - against time capsule) |
00:36 | heap_ | mk001: timemachine? |
00:36 | mk001 | yes sorry - timemachine |
00:36 | heap_ | mk001: but do you have original apple time capsule? hw? |
00:36 | mk001 | I have one, yes |
00:37 | mk001 | but as said before mother has this zyxel smart box |
00:37 | heap_ | i was unable to make work timemachine on linux works w/out issues |
00:37 | mk001 | and gloabally I have pool dedicated for timemachine on the network terra byte storage |
00:37 | heap_ | mk001: but i wanted run everything on linux didnt wante to buy another hw ;/ |
00:37 | mk001 | so it all goes there |
00:38 | mk001 | you can |
00:38 | mk001 | mine xxxTB pool is ZFS pool |
00:38 | mk001 | on debian |
00:38 | mk001 | the timemachine destination is on it |
00:38 | heap_ | no because there are still issues if u try to simulate timemachine and not running oroginal time capsule |
00:38 | heap_ | thats what i was told |
00:39 | mk001 | you was told not quite right |
00:39 | heap_ | and when i tried it on ext4 got corrupted backups etc |
00:39 | heap_ | or whole sparsebundle where timeachine stored data got corrupted |
00:39 | mk001 | yes, the problem is / but with trying to emulate timemachine as backup proto |
00:39 | mk001 | not with having data pool anywhere else |
00:39 | mk001 | you just need to install TIMEMACHINE service |
00:39 | mk001 | anywhere on the network |
00:40 | mk001 | (on macosx of course) |
00:40 | mk001 | then in it you can pick ANY destination as data storage |
00:40 | mk001 | and all macs are talking to native timemachine service |
00:41 | heap_ | i emulated timemachine on linux as netatalk |
00:41 | mk001 | yes I know |
00:41 | mk001 | those hacks |
00:41 | heap_ | thats wrong? |
00:41 | mk001 | as said earlier |
00:41 | heap_ | can timemachine on osx use ext4 storage? |
00:41 | heap_ | or how u cant to use that pool? |
00:41 | mk001 | YES IT CAN |
00:41 | heap_ | zfs or ext4 |
00:42 | mk001 | over the network |
00:42 | mk001 | perhaps even directly |
00:42 | mk001 | if there is OSX EXT4 driver |
00:42 | heap_ | do you nfs4 or smb? |
00:42 | heap_ | mean* |
00:42 | mk001 | but I never tried, as again i'm plain ZFS everywhere |
00:42 | heap_ | so how u store on your zfs timemachine data? |
00:42 | mk001 | the network pool is NFS |
00:42 | heap_ | u exported zfs via nfs? |
00:42 | mk001 | yes |
00:43 | mk001 | and osx natively migrated to SMB in 10.9 |
00:43 | heap_ | but hm ok so i cant just run timemachine client i have to run timemachine service? |
00:43 | mk001 | there is no appetalk / netatalk |
00:43 | mk001 | heap_: yes, that's the way apple designed it/ tested it / and it simply works |
00:44 | mk001 | everything else is ... . constant care of something not working as should |
00:44 | heap_ | bc when i open timemachine from topbar menu i can see only APF disk |
00:44 | mk001 | heap_: yes, :) i was being funny about that recently |
00:44 | heap_ | i cant see there any smb/nfs disk that i mounted |
00:44 | mk001 | even apple can be stupid like microsoft |
00:45 | mk001 | problem is, that timemachine still HARD depends on HARD LINKS |
00:45 | mk001 | but hard links are normally not working over differetn storage, or directories |
00:45 | mk001 | so APPLE hacked it into own extensonsions |
00:45 | mk001 | of AFP |
00:45 | heap_ | mk001: so how can u access nfs/smb storage using timemachine? |
00:45 | mk001 | let me finish |
00:45 | mk001 | ;) |
00:46 | heap_ | ok |
00:46 | mk001 | so that all means, even macosx is emulating AFP over SMB to make timemachine work |
00:46 | mk001 | ((untii they develop something different)) |
00:46 | mk001 | so to answer your qustion |
00:46 | mk001 | question |
00:47 | mk001 | yes, it works |
00:47 | mk001 | BECAUSE |
00:47 | mk001 | timemachine has to provide ENV for hardlinks -> this goes only over AFP, but Timemachine has to "emulate" that on top of SMB/NFS anyhow, as AFP doesn't exists anymore |
00:48 | mk001 | so this is clinet mac -> talking to timemachine service |
00:48 | mk001 | then the second part TM -> storage |
00:48 | mk001 | was never limited / is not limitd |
00:48 | mk001 | you pick anything the service can access |
00:49 | mk001 | so locally seen storage, network mounted shares, doesn't matter |
00:50 | heap_ | mk001: i have mounted smb share but i cant see it inside tm |
00:50 | mk001 | so you installed TM server service already ? |
00:50 | heap_ | no let me do this |
00:51 | mk001 | you have to buy maxos server |
00:51 | mk001 | 19,90 usd |
00:51 | heap_ | ah ;/ |
00:51 | heap_ | but then u need a hw to run it |
00:51 | mk001 | basically that HW can be your macbook |
00:52 | heap_ | hrm so u can run maxos server inside osx? |
00:52 | mk001 | "server" means like ten daemons / services |
00:52 | mk001 | + GUI mngmt tool |
00:52 | mk001 | yes, it's called server |
00:52 | mk001 | but it is Extensions (based on OPEN protocols (like ldap, nfsd, and others)) |
00:53 | mk001 | to povide "server" services |
00:53 | mk001 | with a GUI |
00:53 | heap_ | but if u say osx server it sounds like separate os |
00:53 | mk001 | so you don't need terminal |
00:53 | mk001 | I know |
00:53 | mk001 | APPLEs marketing |
00:53 | mk001 | not mine |
00:53 | mk001 | there is also postgres |
00:54 | mk001 | some XSAN tools |
00:54 | heap_ | but from what you are saying i got u can run osx serve inside osx system? |
00:54 | mk001 | ah |
00:54 | mk001 | DNSs bind server |
00:54 | mk001 | + dhcp |
00:54 | mk001 | all with full GUI to manage |
00:54 | mk001 | OH |
00:55 | mk001 | and apache with php and python and cgi |
00:55 | mk001 | and over it all unified certificate management |
00:55 | mk001 | quite usefull if you don't want to have opened terminal all the time |
00:55 | mk001 | with banch if google searches and MAN pages |
00:56 | mk001 | banch = bunch |
00:56 | heap_ | let me go thru http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/apple-in-the-enterprise/how-to-set-up-apple-os-x-server/ |
00:56 | mk001 | yes |
00:56 | mk001 | that's it |
00:56 | mk001 | on apple store for 19 |
00:56 | mk001 | with the licensing as always |
00:57 | heap_ | hrm so you run osx server inside osx install |
00:57 | mk001 | you can install and USE it in parallel in all your CLOUD / family machines |
00:57 | mk001 | yes, I have one mac mini model 2010 |
00:57 | mk001 | with no more use |
00:57 | mk001 | basically like OVERPOWERED TC |
00:57 | heap_ | mk001: but i have only macbook pro |
00:58 | mk001 | I can give you air 2009 (core2duo + 4gb ram + 128ssd) with no monitor |
00:58 | mk001 | (with no screen) |
00:58 | mk001 | for free |
00:58 | mk001 | :) |
00:59 | heap_ | why without screen? |
00:59 | heap_ | you mean macbook air? |
00:59 | mk001 | yes |
00:59 | mk001 | 1260 model |
00:59 | heap_ | u dont need it anymore? |
00:59 | mk001 | without sceen because I run over it with car |
01:00 | mk001 | no, I have no use for it |
01:03 | kasvain | lol! |
01:04 | kasvain | in speaking of i managed to repair customer's iphone4 which was ran over with car equipped with stud tires |
01:04 | kasvain | managed to make the frame straight and assembly it without laughing edges |
01:05 | kasvain | before and after pics should have been taken, epic look |
01:41 | mk001 | LD |
01:41 | mk001 | :D |
01:44 | Hilikus | hello |
01:46 | Hilikus | i'm considering buying a cuboxTV but i can't find a definitive answer wether i will be able to use to for netflix streaming. can someone tell me if it works well |
06:44 | Defiant | Hilikus: google for kodi netflix, the answer is usually no |
06:45 | Hilikus | Defiant: ok so it's an issue more with Kodi than with the device it seems. What about if I use android (i understand I can boot into openelec/kodi or android) |
16:03 | heap_ | whqts the latest kernel version from the solidrun? |
16:08 | Artox | heap_: 3.14.54 |
16:13 | heap_ | any plans for 4x? |
16:14 | Artox | as far as I know |
16:14 | Artox | mainline works |
16:14 | Artox | just without gpu/vpu and idk what else |
16:14 | Artox | other than that, no clue if there is another plan |
16:15 | heap_ | i need 3.19 bc of btrfs |
16:16 | Artox | you mean btrfs bugs in 3.14? |
16:16 | Artox | I love them! |
16:16 | Artox | (only because f2fs is more broken) |
16:17 | heap_ | what bugs?i need r5 support and recovery |
16:19 | Artox | I had crashes with btrfs and compression |
16:19 | Artox | I think |
16:19 | Artox | on 3.14 |
16:19 | Artox | f2f2 however was going OOM with chown -R |
16:20 | Artox | just try btrfs on 3.14 |
16:20 | Artox | and see if its good enough |
16:20 | heap_ | strangr 3.14 shold be ok |
16:23 | heap_ | or i should try kernel from the xbian? |
16:23 | heap_ | whwre is jnette |
16:24 | Artox | xbian? |
16:24 | Artox | idk |
16:24 | Artox | just tkae *the* kernel :) |
16:24 | Artox | what are you running? |
16:25 | heap_ | soliidrun deb |
16:25 | Artox | http://solid-run.com/wiki/doku.php?id=products:imx6:software:development:kernel#kernel1 |
16:25 | Artox | and whats wrong with it, heap_? |
16:25 | Artox | (because thats the one I maintain) |
16:25 | Artox | topi`: ping |
16:25 | heap_ | Artox: which one |
16:26 | heap_ | i was told on btrfs that never kernel the better |
16:27 | Artox | the solidrun debian images |
16:27 | Artox | and their kernel package (.deb) |
16:27 | Artox | heap_: that is sort of true |
16:27 | Artox | newer kernels probably have more bugs fixed |
16:28 | Artox | and, can have new ones opened |
16:28 | Artox | but I have been using my ssd with btrfs |
16:28 | Artox | for over a year |
16:28 | Artox | with all SR 3.14 kernels since |
16:28 | heap_ | i need 3.19 |
16:28 | heap_ | becsue of r5 supoort |
16:28 | Artox | raid5? |
16:28 | Artox | supposedly works with 3.14 too |
16:29 | Artox | http://marc.merlins.org/perso/btrfs/post_2014-03-23_Btrfs-Raid5-Status.html |
16:29 | Artox | found this post |
16:29 | Artox | "As of 3.14, it works if everything goes right, but the error handling is still lacking. Unexpected conditions are likely to cause unexpected failures. Buyer beware :)" |
16:29 | Artox | I cant give you any 3.19 though. Maybe you just want to use mainline |
16:30 | Artox | I should probably make a debian package of mainline, some day ..... |
16:30 | heap_ | well r5 works wjth 3.14 |
16:30 | heap_ | but r5 recovery works from 3.19 |
16:30 | bencoh | is it supposed to be "stable" enough to use it for data you care about? |
16:31 | Artox | I heard someone in here tell me btrfs has n ot ever been in such a state |
16:31 | Artox | but I wouldnt risk it |
16:31 | bencoh | that's what I thought |
16:32 | heap_ | its not? |
16:32 | bencoh | (not production-ready_ |
16:32 | heap_ | i thought its stable. |
16:32 | bencoh | it might depend on the features you use |
16:32 | bencoh | (and your luck) |
16:32 | heap_ | hrrrrr |
16:32 | heap_ | so what to do |
16:35 | Artox | I personally would say software raid |
16:35 | Artox | mdadm |
16:35 | Artox | or try mainline |
16:37 | heap_ | ah |
16:37 | heap_ | :( |
17:04 | heap_ | Artox: around? |
17:06 | Artox | yes |
17:13 | heap_ | Artox: so do you think i can use 3.19 with the same patches as 3.14 |
17:13 | Artox | nope |
17:13 | heap_ | ;/ |
17:13 | Artox | sorry I dont have anything more constructive to offer |
17:14 | heap_ | or any plans to patch 3.19 similarly as 3.14 is |
17:14 | Artox | I dont think there are |
17:14 | Artox | jnettlet would know |
17:14 | Artox | either he has, or he hasnt |
17:14 | heap_ | ;/ |
17:14 | heap_ | will see no idea where is he |
17:14 | Artox | he is just busy |
17:15 | heap_ | okay |
17:15 | heap_ | will see |
17:15 | heap_ | thx |
17:20 | vpeter | heap_: mk01 is using some 4.0+ kernel. |
17:23 | heap_ | yeah i heard about it |
17:24 | heap_ | but the thing is or at least what ppl from #btrfs say that its still not stable in r5 config |
17:28 | heap_ | so clearly, i have no idea what setup should i use |
17:28 | heap_ | ;-) |
17:36 | Artox | heap_: is there anything against latest mainline? |
17:42 | heap_ | Artox: whats the latest mainline? |
17:43 | heap_ | Artox: i mean generally btrfs is not in the state to run btrfs r5 |
17:43 | heap_ | without possible issues, what i was told |
17:43 | Artox | 4.4-rc1 |
17:43 | heap_ | Artox: but u said that one is not patched for cubox |
17:44 | Artox | it works on cubox |
17:44 | Artox | what doesnt work is |
17:44 | Artox | GPU |
17:44 | Artox | VPU |
17:44 | Artox | do you want these= |
17:44 | heap_ | for what are these good for? encrypto? or media? |
17:45 | Artox | Media |
17:45 | Artox | OpenGL |
17:45 | Artox | and video coding |
17:45 | heap_ | i dont need any media |
17:45 | heap_ | it meant to be NAS onlyt |
17:45 | heap_ | nas only box |
18:18 | heap_ | Artox: well i thought each kernel is slightly modified for the cubox purpose... then whats the diff between arch and deb kernel? based on what you are saying there is no diff? |
18:20 | heap_ | mk001: hi |
18:42 | Artox | heap_: arch and debian? |
18:42 | Artox | no clue |
18:42 | Artox | because I have no clue what archlinux people are doing |
18:42 | Artox | the debian kernel in solidrun images |
18:42 | Artox | is maintained by jnettlet |
18:43 | Artox | GPU/VPU is very important for many people |
18:43 | Artox | as is crypto support |
18:43 | heap_ | mainline also? |
18:43 | Artox | Russell King works on mainline support |
18:43 | Artox | feeding patches in |
18:43 | Artox | but there are things that dont go easily into mainline |
18:44 | Artox | there is ongoing work on an opensource graphics stack however |
18:44 | Artox | etnaviv |
18:46 | heap_ | yeh crypto support another important part |
18:50 | heap_ | thats key for me |
19:46 | heap_ | too hard to install sd card on macdevice |
19:47 | heap_ | apple |
20:33 | heap_ | well so i cant boot official solidrun debian with that esata box |
20:33 | heap_ | arch can run with it |
20:33 | heap_ | ah ok |
20:33 | heap_ | it booted up |
20:34 | heap_ | just hdmi output is blackhole |
20:35 | heap_ | The program 'less' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: |
20:35 | heap_ | uhm whats that debian install ;/ |
20:35 | heap_ | only shell?:> |
20:37 | heap_ | it looks like that arch arm is better tunned then debian |
20:37 | heap_ | i can see only 2 drives from 4 total |
20:38 | heap_ | http://pastie.org/10561172 |
20:38 | heap_ | mk001: around |
20:39 | mk001 | heap_: yes, just busy |
20:40 | heap_ | ah ok |
20:42 | heap_ | mk001: ping me when you are free |
20:52 | heap_ | ah is there anyone who is maintaing that debian for cubox? |
20:52 | heap_ | i cant even do apt-get update... |
20:53 | heap_ | Err https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Packages The requested URL returned error: 404 |
20:53 | heap_ | W: Failed to fetch https://repo.solid-build.xyz/debian/wheezy/bsp-imx6/./Sources The requested URL returned error: 404 |
21:10 | Artox | heap_: looking into it |
21:10 | Artox | hang on |
21:12 | heap_ | ok |
21:14 | heap_ | Artox: thx |
21:21 | Artox | heap_: something is indeed wrong with the wheezy repo |
21:21 | Artox | :< |
21:21 | Artox | looks like something went wrong while mirroring |
21:21 | heap_ | ;-((( |
21:21 | heap_ | why? |
21:21 | heap_ | shit |
21:21 | Artox | just a few files missing |
21:22 | Artox | will have to do some more tests before I republish |
21:22 | heap_ | are u able to fix? |
21:22 | Artox | because there are updates queued |
21:23 | heap_ | Artox: are u able to fix it? |
21:23 | Artox | sure |
21:23 | heap_ | perfect. |
21:23 | Artox | but it will be a few minutes still |
21:23 | Artox | if all goes well |
21:23 | heap_ | np, pls let me know |
21:23 | heap_ | ill retest |
21:24 | Artox | now pray reboot works |
21:24 | heap_ | bc all of disk enclosure crashes... |
21:24 | heap_ | Block bitmap differences: +(1474302497--1474302752) +(1526631550--1526633000) +(1526633002--1526661119) +(1526863104--1526863359) |
21:24 | heap_ | shit |
21:24 | heap_ | hope data wont be corrupted |
21:24 | Artox | but there are no changes to the kernel about disk thingies |
21:24 | Artox | just |
21:24 | Artox | looks like display is working again |
21:24 | Artox | yay |
21:33 | Artox | looks good enough. Now to try another board |
21:34 | heap_ | ok |
21:41 | Artox | other board worked too |
21:43 | Artox | something is wrong with audio, but I am publishing repos nnow |
21:49 | heap_ | so ready? |
21:49 | Artox | nop |
21:49 | Exaga | Artox: o/ |
21:50 | Artox | Greetings Exaga |
21:50 | Exaga | malte_: o/ |
21:50 | Exaga | hey there |
21:52 | Artox | heap_: please try if apt-get update reports any errors now |
21:55 | heap_ | ok |
22:01 | heap_ | Artox: no errors |
22:02 | Artox | great |
22:02 | Artox | thanks |
22:06 | heap_ | np |
22:10 | heap_ | any idea |
22:10 | heap_ | [ 409.807222] mxc_hdmi 20e0000.hdmi_video: mxc_hdmi_cable_connected_edid reports DVI mode |
22:10 | heap_ | [ 412.084363] mxc_hdmi 20e0000.hdmi_video: same edid |
22:11 | heap_ | and hdmi connection to monitor doesnt work |
22:11 | heap_ | monitor is black |
22:11 | Artox | after update and reboot? |
22:12 | Artox | its a DVI monitor, right? |
22:13 | heap_ | ye |
22:13 | heap_ | after reboot |
22:14 | Artox | :/ |
22:14 | Artox | cant help you there |
22:14 | Artox | mk001: you know something about DVI screens? |
22:16 | mk001 | some little |
22:16 | mk001 | what we with jnettlet did |
22:16 | mk001 | why |
22:16 | Artox | another report of dvi not working |
22:16 | Artox | :) |
22:17 | mk001 | oh ok from heap |
22:17 | Artox | and when I tried saturday night, my dvi screen didn't work either |
22:17 | mk001 | I will discuss with him |
23:40 | Artox | in case anybody is interested: I published new debian images with the latest kernel updates, and updates to the vpu libs |
23:41 | Artox | nothing in there that can not be achieved by apt-get upgrade |