| 13:02 | heap_ | hi, is there any stable linux + kernel for the old version of the cubox cubox pro v1 online? |
| 16:14 | flips | Anyone running Alpine Linux on CuBox? (I've got the i4-Pro) |
| 18:05 | heap_ | anyne around? |
| 18:05 | heap_ | jnettlet: ? |
| 20:21 | jnettlet | heap_, here. What's up? |
| 20:46 | Exaga | jnettlet: http://arm.slackware.com :/ |
| 20:46 | Exaga | read the top announcement |
| 20:54 | jnettlet | Well that is unfortunate but understandable |
| 20:58 | heap_ | jnettlet: is there any debian/ + kernel for cubox prov1? |
| 20:58 | heap_ | i mean something stable |
| 21:06 | Exaga | jnettlet: it will have a massive impact with terminal repurcussions on the work i do |
| 21:06 | Exaga | i sincerely hope someone else picks up the port |
| 21:09 | jnettlet | heap_ I think much is upstream. Accept 4.5 has some breakage from what rmk was telling me. |
| 21:10 | jnettlet | Exaga, h |
| 21:10 | jnettlet | How portable is your work? |
| 21:11 | Exaga | pretty much slackware specific |
| 21:11 | heap_ | jnettlet: i mean old cubox cubox prov1 |
| 21:11 | Exaga | everything else these days runs systemd |
| 21:12 | Exaga | slackware has no steenking systemd :> |
| 21:36 | flips | Maybe Alpine Linux arm would work on Cubox? (They use OpenRC) |
| 21:38 | Artox | Exaga: Q: was slackware sfp only? |
| 21:38 | Artox | that post makes it sound like they are discontinuing armel |
| 21:38 | Artox | not armhf |
| 21:39 | Artox | but maybe there never was armhf in slackware? |
| 23:41 | Exaga | Artox: ya |
| 23:41 | Exaga | Artox: there is no slackware arm hard float |
| 23:41 | Exaga | nor is there a 64bit version |
| 23:42 | Exaga | both of these are required i think |
| 23:42 | Exaga | and that my friend is a LOT of work :> |